Given that we are constantly told what a great collective force the EU is, it's pretty astounding that there isn't a joined up approach from them on how to deal with this problem, it's been going on for quite a while now. Most member states seem to be passing the buck, leaving Italy and Greece, the latter with it's own insoluble problems, to get on with it. Clearly some of the migrants are desperate, Syrians particularly they will surely be killed if they stay there, so morally we have a duty. Similarly Sudanese and Eritreans, I believe, both live under repressive regimes. However, I'm not sure every African that arrives in Europe is leaving for the same reasons, some are without a doubt economic migrants, Ghanians? correct me if I'm wrong I thought Ghana was reasonably stable. I have also heard that as far as Africa is concerned it is the middle classes that are leaving, if that is the case surely their skills are needed at home. At what point does the flow of economic migrants to Europe become unsustainable, after all if that premise was taken to a conclusion, possibly, in time they would follow the example of those that have gone and the trickle would become a constant flow, surely Europe is not in a position to absorb such numbers.
My other thoughts are when I hear the interviews with the migrants most of them want to come to the richer northern parts of Europe, maybe in some cases because they have family there, but not all of them will and I don't think they should be given the opportunity to cherry pick. A lot of Eastern Europe have smaller populations and I think they should be expected to take their fair share and introduce a bit of much needed racial diversity to those parts. I also think places like Australia, yes I know about Tony Abbott's stance and New Zealand, our NZ friends tell us they take very few and Canada, all fairly under populated could take a few more too.