Gransnet forums

News & politics

The Truth Behind The Deficit.?

(99 Posts)
Parliament100 Mon 06-Jul-15 19:04:02

David Cameron is using the deficit as a cover to dismantle all the social changes that came in under a Labour Government in 1945-48, and there is no opposition to it

The Tory mantra of making painful cuts to reduce the deficit is little more than a smoke screen they hide behind to implement their ideology of reducing the size of the State, driving down wages, cutting benefits ect.

My guess is that they'd make pretty much the same decisions for ideological reasons even if there wasn't a deficit.

The cynic in me says how easy it is for the right wing comfortably well off, greed infested Tory supporters to ridicule and chastise people on the receiving end of Tory cuts in welfare. And how equally easy it is for the right wing press to encourage this, just to sell their papers.

The Thatcherist, hard line, anti social policies the Tory's are forcing on us all makes them feel superior. And they perpetuate the suffering while living in their comfy homes without a conscience.

The Tory's pretend to care about the pensioners having to choose between heating, or eating, the Tory's pretend to care about the family's wondering how they are going to feed their children today and tomorrow.

The Tory's since Thatcher have been the same !

No longer a small "c" left of centre Conservative party with a good social conscience.
No, since the 80's they have been ultra right wing, hardnosed, and with no compassion but to condemn the poor to a life of misery and no hope so long as they can live in relative luxury.

This is how they want it, to keep the masses under their eternal control. The Tories only aim is power and control.

For that reason the Tories love it when the economy is bad, so bad that they blame the masses of poor for it. It is malicious and insidious.

And what makes it even more appalling is that the Tories actually do believe they are superior intellectually to everybody else.

1 million people are now forced to use Food banks in 21st century Britain,

It’s a disgrace, and what’;s worse it all started with Thatcher over 30 years ago when the iron lady started rolling back the State, Cameron is now finishing the job.

whenim64 Mon 06-Jul-15 19:32:42

Parliament100 whilst I disagree with much of tory policy, your diatribe which is peppered with insulting adjectives doesn't exactly enhance your explanation. To say that these changes will be dismantled with no opposition doesn't make sense. Do you mean tory MPs will be ordered not to oppose them? Not all agree, after all. Socialist supporters can argue against these plans more effectively without your help, thanks very much. Or maybe you're not a socialist?

Parliament100 Mon 06-Jul-15 20:48:24

My politics have nothing to do with what the Tory's are doing. They are running down all the social changes that came in under a Labour Government after WW2, and they are getting away with it.

There are a lot of decent left of centre Conservatives who dont like what's happen, but they cant do a thing about it.

whenim64 Mon 06-Jul-15 21:03:41

Parliament why run down all of them in your first post and defend some of them in your latest, then? Confusing!

Parliament100 Mon 06-Jul-15 21:19:51

Its not confusing if you know what's truly happening care of Cameron and Osborne.

Gracesgran Mon 06-Jul-15 21:30:23

I think many will agree with Parliament100, whenim64 and I am not sure what "insulting adjectives" you are seeing.

Ana Mon 06-Jul-15 22:13:25

'greed infested Tory supporters' is one phrase that I noted, Gracesgran, although not technically an adjective of course...hmm

Gracesgran Mon 06-Jul-15 22:39:28

It doesn't say all Tory supporters are greed infested Ana and, although I do think a few will be, I feel many of the people who paint all those receiving benefits as being of a particular type are just lacking in knowledge while believing the propaganda - they may not all be Tory supporters either.

Parliament100 Tue 07-Jul-15 08:18:07

First of all in my opinion we do not spend too much on welfare. We dont spend enough!

Our State pensions are much lower than European levels, and German Social Security is 3 to 4 times higher than ours, and non means tested.

This is proven by a recent press article stating that English immigrants unemployed in Germany receive three to four times the amount of non- means tested Social Security from the German tax payer, than Eastern European immigrants unemployed here in Britain receive from the British tax payer in means tested benefits.

Welfare spending on State pensioners here in Britain represents 46 per cent of the budget, the highest proportion, with the Winter Fuel payment representing just 2 per cent, and Pensions Credit is just 5 per cent..

Income Support represents 5 per cent of the budget, and Employment Support Allowance is just 2 per cent, with Job Seekers Allowance at just 3 per cent. Disability Living Allowance is just 8 per cent. And Housing Benefit is just 14 per cent, other benefits are even less by percentage, but we are being lead to believe we have a bludgeoning State, we dont!

TV programmes like Benefits Street, have truly cornered the market in cheap, sensationalist, so-called entertainment, and people watch, then judge, then make it the whole.

And in my view, this is part parcel of how and why David Cameron made it back into number 10. 36.7 per cent of the electorate, under 25 per cent of the population, assisted in securing David Cameron another 5 years in Government. 75 per cent of the country didn’t want Cameron back in number 10. This is a true vote of no confidence in the Government and in our totally undemocratic “first past the post” voting system, FPTP, is simply not fit for purpose.

In my 99.9 per cent of the public dont realise that this right wing Tory Government are using the deficit as a cover to shrink the State for ideological reasons, Austerity is just a media tag, and further more this all began in the 1980’s when Margaret Thatcher began rolling back the State for the same ideological purposes.

When the 2010 coalition was formed David Cameron and George Osborne continued where Margaret Thatcher left off, and now since May 7th, 37 per cent of the English electorate put David Cameron and George Osborne back into 10 Downing Street, effectively giving them permission to carry through Margaret Thatcher’s original 1980 objective to shrink the State further, and this is exactly what they are doing. They are driven by their right wing ideology, nothing will derail them from their target.

Britain is an exceedingly rich country, no child need live in poverty, , nobody should need to rely on food banks, but they do.

According to The Trussell Trust, over 1 million people now use food banks, and The Trussell Trust say this figure doesn’t include food banks run by other charities, and churches.

But this right wing Tory Government are not reducing the State due to costs, David Cameron and George Osborne are reducing the State because they are ideologically opposed to the State and everything attached to it. They do not believe in the concept of the NHS, and they have an inherent loathing of the Welfare State.

We are allowing ourselves to be conned into believing that Tory Austerity is good for us, good for the country, good for the tax paper. Why else would 37 per cent of the English electorate, from a 66 per cent turn-out, vote for more of the same ?. It’s because we English are largely not political animals, unlike the German’s, French, and Greeks.

I have always known that Britain’s welfare State is based on charity, paid out on a means tested bases, to those most in need, targeted, with a costly and expensive bureaucratic system behind it.

Where European Welfare Systems are based on solidarity, non means tested, EU workers pay more income tax and other contributions to pay for generous payments compared to ours.....

And this is because the European State plays a vital role in investment and subsidy, where the UK’s State has been rolled back and stigmatized since the 1980’s and the Thatcher years.

I just cannot believe those who voted Tory on May 7th, truly want the kind of society David Cameron and George Osborne are creating ?

POGS Tue 07-Jul-15 08:57:53

Are you the young lad on the internet talking about cigarettes by any chance?

rosesarered Tue 07-Jul-15 09:06:07

Yes, I think he may be POGS, or a bored student now that Uni is over for Summer.

grumppa Tue 07-Jul-15 09:14:13

I hope he isn't the new Greek Finance Minister.

rosesarered Tue 07-Jul-15 09:17:20

Of course! that must be it Grumppa , wondered what had happened to him.

Elegran Tue 07-Jul-15 09:26:38

No, it must be Durhamjen trying out a double membership. (must put in a grin here in case I am blasted for abusing her)

Notso Tue 07-Jul-15 09:27:21

grumpa grin

TerriBull Tue 07-Jul-15 09:32:18

Possibly Ivanhoe - remember him? or possibly progeny or partner of Ivanhoe!

TerriBull Tue 07-Jul-15 09:46:55

One trick pony ranter, do try a gentler thread say "baby vitamins" or "hand washing" as opposed to hand wringing!

Parliament100 Tue 07-Jul-15 09:49:44

Well your all wrong, and ive noticed not one constructive comment about my realistic posting. "grumppa". I say well done to the Greeks, at least they show solidarity, which is more than we do. Apathy, and political ignorance rule England, always has, and always will.

POGS Tue 07-Jul-15 09:52:33

Parliament 100

Do you have a blog site?

rosesarered Tue 07-Jul-15 09:53:10

Well, being ' political animals' has gone well for Greece hasn't it?

nigglynellie Tue 07-Jul-15 10:06:46

I'm not sure how anyone can answer the OP. All I know is that we live in very difficult, dangerous times and that money has to be spent wisely from a much reduced cake. To equate social reforms with those of 70 years ago is just plain ridiculous! Society has changed out of all recognition and nothing stands still. Like it or not, there are people out there who openly milk the system, leaving less for others in genuine need. Surely this needs addressing, or is a free for all?! with the tax payer picking up the bill.
FGS, can't people move away from constantly harking back to Mrs Thatcher? Has it seriously been forgotten what a terrible state this country was in literally verging on bankcruptcy, when she came to power thirty six, yes 36 (!!) years ago! There has actually been a labour government since then so why doesn't that ever come up for scrutiny?!

rosesarered Tue 07-Jul-15 10:10:59

Excellent post NN, even though we don't know if this poster is old enough to remember Margaret Thatcher.Or anything else.

nigglynellie Tue 07-Jul-15 10:43:23

That is a point rose!!'

POGS Tue 07-Jul-15 11:29:11

Good post Nigglynellie.

I wish we could do Minecraft on here, I would build you a brick wall to bash your head on smile

nigglynellie Tue 07-Jul-15 11:32:48

My grandson is very into Minecraft, I can always ask him!!!