Gransnet forums

News & politics

Photographing buildings.

(7 Posts)
durhamjen Wed 01-Jul-15 17:48:32

I think this is the silliest thing I have ever heard.

"On 9 July 2015, the European Parliament might destroy photography.

The Freedom of taking photos in public places is under attack. Until now, in most countries in Europe you were safe to take and publish photographs that are taken from public ground – This is called Freedom of Panorama. When you were on vacation, you could take a photo from the London Eye and share it with your friends on Facebook*. If someone wanted to pay you for using this photo, that was okay as well. Both is about to change may destroy photography as we know it.

Julia Reda, member of the European Parliament, tried to bring the Freedom of Panorama to all countries of the EU, as few countries like France and Italy don’t have such law yet. In the majority of countries such as the UK, Spain, Portugal, Germany, Netherlands, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Austria and Croatia, you’re safe to take, publish and sell photos of public buildings when taken from public grounds.

However, the current draft turned the proposal upside down. Instead of bringing the Freedom of Panorama to the few countries that don’t know such law yet, it would take it away from all those who do. With this, Street-, Travel- and Architecture-Photography would be dead as we know it. It is impossible to find out the architect of every public building in order to ask for permission before you can publish and possibly sell the photo.

I therefore call on the members of the European Parliament to

Not limit the Freedom of Panorama in any way

and instead to

Bring the Freedom of Panorama to all member states of the EU

so that the European Citizens can be assured to act within the law when taking and publishing photographs from public buildings anywhere in the European Union. This is necessary to embrace our European Culture and Art!

*As Julia Reda, member of the European Parliament, points out, even the private upload of a photograph on Facebook would need the consent of the architect, as with the upload you grant Facebook a license to commercially use the photograph."

durhamjen Wed 01-Jul-15 17:49:56

Petition on www.change.org if you agree.

ninathenana Wed 01-Jul-15 17:51:44

Heard about this the other day.
I totally agree durhamjen

POGS Wed 01-Jul-15 18:10:06

Of course it's utterly ridiculous but that's the problem with the European Parliament.!

It is a beurocratic institution stuffed with more than it's fair share of idiots. Any good they do they unravel it by producing such clap trap.

I know the point is supposed to be this is intended for 'commercial' not tourist photos but the EU can't help itself.

If as-h-l--es could fly the EU Parliament would be an airport.

durhamjen Wed 01-Jul-15 18:24:32

How many of you have taken photos in France or Italy and not known that there was no law to say you could?
I've got boxes full of them.

Why was there a need to do it in the first place?

Nelliemoser Wed 01-Jul-15 18:25:42

Bloody stupid. Would I have to contact the architect of Exeter Cathedral aboiut the lovely photos I took there?

durhamjen Wed 01-Jul-15 18:45:56

Like most laws, I doubt it could be applied retrospectively.