I wonder if the naval officer who allegedly had an affair with a subordinate, had been a male, if anything would have been said. I doubt it.
To get back to NanKate's original OP, this is ambiguous. Do you mean would anything have been said by the RN, or would it have been reported in the media, NanKate?
Most certainly the RN would have dealt with this in exactly the same way under the Rules which apply to the Armed Forces.
Would it have been reported in the media? Possibly yes, if the captain of a ship at sea had had to be sent home for having an affair on board with a subordinate. Possibly not so extensively; the reason it has been commented on so much is because she was the first of what everyone was hoping would be many such appointments. All eyes were on her anyway for that reason; other ambitious women RN officers and other ranks will possibly now have to overcome prejudice because of her actions.
I'm not condoning her actions Rose it's just the double standards that annoy me.
NanKate, do you mean double standards by the Royal Navy or double standards by the media?
She will receive the same treatment as any other captain who did the same. The media is probably more interested because of what I said above about her being the first such appointment.
I certainly would throw away the career of someone if they have made one error of judgement of this type
Holly, (presuming you mean not) she has been sent home awaiting discipline. She has not been dismissed the service as far as I know, or lost rank.
If you do not have discipline in the armed forces you end up with the chaos seen in some other countries where they run amok.
No point in making any more statements, as I said civilians will just not understand.