Gransnet forums

Arts & crafts

Is it too late?

(24 Posts)
Cossy Mon 18-May-26 22:08:53

I’m 67 and useless at sewing (truly rubbish) BUT I’m going to bite the bullet and learn at least to hem, my trousers and skirts and dresses are always too long, as I’m wide but not tall!

So, my question is can anyone recommend a “beginners” sewing machine, which is fairly basic and threads itself?? (If that possible(), oh and not ludicrously expensive?

Moth62 Mon 18-May-26 22:47:30

I bought quite a simple Japanese make machine from Tesco a few years ago with my Tesco vouchers. It doesn’t thread itself though.

Allira Mon 18-May-26 23:03:32

Do you have a sewing machine shop or outlet near you?

I did some research and decided on a Janome fairly basic machine about five years ago. Singer make a basic one as well and I'd had a Singer for over 40 years.

If you decide, don't get talked out of it or persuaded by 'special offers' as I was and bought a more expensive Brother machine which I find too complicated!!

Retread Tue 19-May-26 07:14:46

The basic Janome that I bought when I retired is perfect. It doesn’t thread itself, but is easy to thread. I mainly use it to shorten trousers or do other minor alterations. I also only really started sewing in my 70s.

Good luck.

AskAlice Tue 19-May-26 07:26:12

Another vote here for Janome. They are very reliable and well-built. Brother also make some good entry-level machines with threaders. I also have Singer machines, but they are not of the same standard and reliability that they were back when my Mum used them. Have a look at the Janome J3-18 online. It's £229 on the Janome web site but can be bought cheaper from other places.

ginny Tue 19-May-26 08:25:21

Another vote for Janome. . I have had my basic one for about 30 years, never had it serviced ( I do remove the fluff that gathers)and it chugs on quite happily.

Luckygirl3 Tue 19-May-26 08:28:43

If your main aim is to be able to hem your clothes then it is best to do this by hand.

Oldnproud Tue 19-May-26 08:37:20

Luckygirl3

If your main aim is to be able to hem your clothes then it is best to do this by hand.

I was thinking the same.

Witzend Tue 19-May-26 10:57:25

Luckygirl3

If your main aim is to be able to hem your clothes then it is best to do this by hand.

This!
I do often wonder how dds, who had a compulsory year of ‘needlework’ at school, apparently weren’t taught a few basics, like turning up a hem properly* (i.e. with minimal showing on the right side) and stitching on a button - properly!

*IIRC it’s what is (or was) called a herringbone stitch (someone will know, which involves (going to R to L on the wrong sides) taking a small stitch from the top layer of the fold, followed by a tiny stitch from the single layer above, rinse and repeat all the way along.
Sounds a lot more complicated than it is!

If anyone wants to see a demonstration, I’m sure there will be one on YouTube. To which I am still grateful for showing me how to purl 2 TBL (through back of loops) - which I could not for the life of me work out!

Cossy Tue 19-May-26 11:03:47

Luckygirl3

If your main aim is to be able to hem your clothes then it is best to do this by hand.

Arthritis in both hands.

Cossy Tue 19-May-26 11:04:07

Thank you everyone for your comments and suggestions.

Allira Tue 19-May-26 11:05:36

Luckygirl3

If your main aim is to be able to hem your clothes then it is best to do this by hand.

Just turned up my jeans on the machine and I have other trousers which I shall shorten by machine too.
I'm shrinking ☹

I can sew by hand, of course, remember the embroidery stitches we learnt at school and have been sewing by machine since I was about 12 but turning up some trousers by machine is fine and much speedier.

Who knows - Cossy might discover a love for sewing and start making all kinds of things!

Esmay Tue 19-May-26 11:08:12

My daughter has a Janome - it's a real workhorse .
Her only criticism it sews slowly.

Allira Tue 19-May-26 11:19:22

That might suit me! I really wish I'd stuck to my decision instead of being persuaded by the very charming saleswoman!

Flippinheck Tue 19-May-26 18:20:06

Another vote for Janome. I have a fairly advanced machine and a serger and both have been totally reliable.

Susie42 Wed 20-May-26 15:55:46

I'm not a fan of Janome but I think that's due to a bad experience with one at a sewing class. A friend has a Brother A65 and loves it. I would avoid present day Singers as they are not the same quality as when they built on Clydeside.

mum2three Wed 20-May-26 15:58:01

Whatever make you choose get one with speed control. If you're a beginner, it can be difficult to control the speed with your foot and the machine runs away with you.

ClicketyClick Thu 21-May-26 17:31:55

If it is literally for just sewing gems then why not use wonderweb. It's so easy and after pinning up the hem, just a quick iron over the hem does the trip. Although I make some of my own clothes I've used this when feeling lazy.

Romola Thu 21-May-26 18:23:26

I agree with Witzend and always alter hems using herringbone stitch. It's sort of flexible and great for stretchy fabrics, or if the two areas ro be sewn are slightly different lengths.

Astitchintime Thu 21-May-26 19:07:56

I bought my previous sewing machine from John Lewis, the staff allowed me to try several machine before making a decision……but I am a skilled seamstress/ tailor.

valdali Thu 21-May-26 20:03:04

Allira

Luckygirl3

If your main aim is to be able to hem your clothes then it is best to do this by hand.

Just turned up my jeans on the machine and I have other trousers which I shall shorten by machine too.
I'm shrinking ☹

I can sew by hand, of course, remember the embroidery stitches we learnt at school and have been sewing by machine since I was about 12 but turning up some trousers by machine is fine and much speedier.

Who knows - Cossy might discover a love for sewing and start making all kinds of things!

Jeans don't look right if you hem them by hand - they need the "top-stitching" look round the bottom.

I bought some thicker, orange "denim" thread to do this (as mine always need shortening, men's jeans fit me better). But half the time I end up with the special thread on the wrong side & the ordinary thread from the bobbin showing hmm

twinnytwin Sun 24-May-26 13:16:18

Valida - there's a really clever way of turning up the hems of jeans that leaves the topstitched original hem in place. Search online on YouTube. There's lots of demos. I wouldn't do them any other way now.

Pearl30 Sun 24-May-26 13:53:23

Many years ago I bought a Silver sewing machine (Lidl’s special offer). Whilst it doesn’t thread itself it is a brilliant machine. Never had it serviced, but I have cleared fluff as and when required. I now have a much more expensive and complex machine, but still go to my Silver.
Like the other poster said, Singer machines are not the same machine or as good as they once were.
The cheaper machines have mostly plastic parts which are not as robust as those with metal parts. The choice between durability vs cost is yours.
You should be able to pick up a modern second hand machine fairly easily and this is a good option for what you want to do with one.
I wouldn’t recommend buying one of those mini machines or the hand hammers. They are usually very quickly given up by users.

Llamedos13 Sun 24-May-26 14:06:06

I bought my sewing machine in a charity shop, it’s an old Singer made in 1960.Built to last with metal parts. It is basic, straight and zigzag stitches and all you need for hemming.I think the older machines were machines were better built as they are metal