I'm keen to emphasise the inequalities inherent in the system, when care for elderly parents, with dementia, becomes necessary. My late father needed such care, and now my mum lives in a home specialising in dementia care. Unlike much that I read about, the home is superb...but comes with price tag to match. So we're selling the family home to pay for it....and, Yvette, you know how little a modest house in the North of England will fetch. Basically, I'm having to gamble that mum doesn't outlive the proceeds of the house sale. How awful is that?!
Yet if mum had an illness needing nursing care, as opposed to dementia, then the NHS would help her with the costs.
I'd really like the Labour Party to recognise these inequalities, and introduce compulsory state insurance, to cover possible future care costs. Much fairer. Like all insurance, some of us would 'win' and others would 'lose'.
My late dad, believed that if he did the right thing, worked hard, and saved, then he and his family would be looked after by the state, from the cradle to the grave, and that he'd be the first of our family to pass on savings and a house to his children. How wrong he was.
Can you offer any hope of change in the system?
(And, yes, I'm part of the stretched generation, caring, gladly, for grandchildren too!)