Gransnet forums

News & politics

The Queen and dedication to duty in the 21st Century

(285 Posts)
EllanVannin Tue 20-Apr-21 14:18:27

Being the Queen is one thing, but an aged member of the public is another. They're entirely separate entitities.

Maybe the Queen is undecided on who is going to make a better job of where she leaves off ? Head of State is no mean feat and to be perfectly honest I wouldn't know myself who'd fit the bill as a close second to her for dedication alone.

EllanVannin Tue 20-Apr-21 14:10:58

People are working beyond retirement age----why ??

Peasblossom Tue 20-Apr-21 14:10:00

I asked Google “what does a head of state do?”

Here’s one definition.

“The role of a head of state is primarily representative, symbolising the unity and integrity of the state both at home and abroad”

Encyclopaedia Brittanica

I’d say she does that pretty well at the moment.

What “work” should Heads of State do that can’t be delegated?

A prime example of ageism?

EllanVannin Tue 20-Apr-21 14:09:59

It's like anyone who doesn't want to give up.
How many over 60's would be willing to forego their work to allow an out of work 25 year old take their place ?

suziewoozie Tue 20-Apr-21 14:05:53

I think it’s incredibly arrogant and self obsessed to think you have to carry on regardless. It’s almost as if she believes in the ‘divine right of kings’.

maddyone Tue 20-Apr-21 14:00:32

She has a good chance of living to 100 ExD as her mother lived to 101. It seems to be ridiculous to me to have a Head of State who is 100 years old.

maddyone Tue 20-Apr-21 13:58:32

Yes, I’m concerned about it Alegrias. I believe the Queen should abdicate because she is now 95 years old, and hand over to her son who is now 72 years old I think. I think the Queen is our longest reigning monarch, and at 95 it is perfectly reasonable to retire.

ExD Tue 20-Apr-21 13:42:42

I can remember her saying she would never give up until she was dead, but can't remember where or when I saw it. I feel the family have been very supportive and now undertake most of the duties very well. She no longer travels overseas. It would be nice to see her make 100.
I only hope Charles doesn't let her down.

Lucca Tue 20-Apr-21 13:34:35

I believe she should take a back seat now. Surely she’s done enough years to qualify s having done her duty? If we’re going to continue with a monarchy surely it should be more modern, which would include retiring ? Personally I think she should have retired at 80 but I am no expert on royalty.....

Alegrias1 Tue 20-Apr-21 13:19:02

Does dedication to duty overwhelm any other consideration when it comes to being Head of State?

Why can a person stay in post, with all the deference that entails, when someone else is doing all the "work"?

Is anyone else worried that a 95 year old lady believes she has to keep on keeping on when many, many other monarchs have moved on in life and their countries haven't crumbled?