Mr Justice Mumby, head of the FamilybDivision has made comment recently about l.a.s using Section 20 of the Children Act as a precursor to care proceedings and indicated l.a's will be subject to stringent questioning in such cases.
s20 is so called voluntary cAre. It's use was supposed to be in cases eg mum with one, mum going into hospital with now family support. In those cases, care proceedings aren't necessary, parents recognise their children need "accommodating" ie foster care for a brief period.
Sadly bad practice led some l.a's to "persuade" parents where significant safeguarding issues exist to sign their agreement to s20 "otherwise w'll take it to court" . Parents without the benefit of legal aid and scared witless will almost always agree to sign. This leaves the children and their parents without legal representation. Such matters can drift for months. Children may be moved between relatives and foster placements
Against this background Cameron wants to double 'forced' adoptions. Terrifying prospect for all concerned. There was a r cent case of a baby returned to birth from prospective adoptive parents a year into placement because birth parents hadn't been legally represented or advised. What pain for all concerned
The cuts to legal aid in family matters is a disgrace
Another Tired Kicking For The Sick And Disabled By Rishi
Good Morning Saturday 20th April 2024