Petition for Police Scotland to record accurately the sex of those accused or convicted of sexual crime, including rape.

Whaaaat?!

Such nonsense.

That's just wrong

The world has gone mad

I despair.

Innocent on a technicality? What a load of b******s! The world is going mad!

This is exactly the sort of thing that those of us who have been arguing against self-id on the numerous trans threads on here have been worried about. We have been called transphobic for expressing these worries, and it has been suggested that we are behind the times, bigoted and worse.

I fear for the world that our daughters and granddaughters will inherit if this is not stoped in its tracks. Men can go anywhere (eg safe houses and refuges for female victims of violence) and join female sports teams and shortlists simply by saying that they identify as female.

I find it very worrying indeed.

Incredible. So someone can't have been raped as the person who raped them is recorded as a woman?

In case it isn't clear in my OP, if a rape has been attempted or committed by a transwoman (male) that person will be recorded as female.
It doesn't mean the offence didn't happen, or doesn't count.
It does mean that the criminal is recorded as female and may very well be placed in a prison for females.

It also means that statistics of 'females' committing sexual crimes will increase, which will disguise the danger posed by males.

This is already the situation in Scotland and the petition is asking the Scottish Government and Police Scotland to record accurately the sex of offenders.

You do not have to live in Scotland to sign it.

It also means that statistics of 'females' committing sexual crimes will increase, which will disguise the danger posed by males.
It also means that other statistics that are gathered to check equal sex-based opportunities, access to facilities, 'gender' pay gaps and so on will be skewed. The rights and considerations that women have fought for for so long will be swept aside.

Not wanting this to happen is not remotely incompatible with having sympathy with and support for those who wish to transition from one gender to another. It is not transphobic to worry about women's rights being thrown under a bus like this.

You are so right Farnorth and Doodledog. I have written to our Police and Crime Commissioner and the leader of our County Council asking for details locally of men committing criminal activity and then identifying as women. Also how it it likely to skew the local crime rate. It was fairly recently so I haven't had a reply yet.

I think this is yet another case of Stonewall giving misinformation and organisations not taking the time to check the legality. Our local Police Authority and Council are high up in the Stonewall Champions League of 850 champions.

I used to support Stonewall but absolutely not over this dangerous nonsense. Women are under threat all over again. Time for a new Suffragette movement?

Thank you. I’ve signed and shared it via my SM.

I actually think it is worse than the impact on statistics and prisons. I think it is further abuse of traumatised women. Imagine being raped and then told your rapist is a female, when by the very nature of what you have experienced you know that is a lie.

If they have a penis and they rape somebody ( male or female)
Then they are a man. Which means they should go to a prison for men.
There was a case of a trans man being put into a women’s prison and attacked at least one woman there sexually.
It’s gone beyond ridiculous now and is scary.
Stonewall was needed as an organisation in the past, now it’s turned its attention to this subject and is just wrong.
Women have enough to put up with!

Indeed, Galaxy, as already happened in 2018 in London after Maria McLaughlin was attacked (not sexually) by a transwoman.

"A year ago I was instructed by District Judge Kenneth Grant to pretend my male assailant was a woman…"

www.peaktrans.org/district-judge-kenneth-grant/

This is American, but the principle holds here, too.

Another response from Police Scotland, confirming their procedure for recording the sex of a suspect or a victim as being whatever the person says it is.

This is the Times article referred to :

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/rape-suspects-can-choose-to-self-identify-as-female-vfl678tg6

In England, a male sex offender claiming to be a woman and protesting because he is in a male prison.

"Now in HMP High Down, in Surrey, she chose not to appear on the video link for the hearing at Durham.

Fiona Lamb, mitigating, said Walker was protesting at being detained in a male prison when she is now female, as she cannot be brought into contact with male inmates, restricting her opportunity to take up activities."

www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/19357818.child-sex-offender-looked-images-naked-babies/

(This person is referred to by female pronouns throughout the newspaper report because that is the accepted rule for journalists.)

Background on Walker :

"her past offences include gross indecency with a female child, two offences of raping a girl, plus possession and distribution of indecent images of children."

Surely if a person has a functioning penis and has employed that penis for the purposes of raping a woman, that person must be sent to a prison for people with a penis

varian

Surely if a person has a functioning penis and has employed that penis for the purposes of raping a woman, that person must be sent to a prison for people with a penis

To state the blindingly obvious. Surely the act of rape makes complete nonsense of any 'self identification' as a female?

Exactly

Stonewall have gone from a group campaigning for lgbtq rights to the thought police. Look on MN, the reports there from people working for colleges, universities etc., who have been ostracised and forced to resign because of their refusal to accept nonsense like the OP reported. It is truly terrifying, and it is women who are suffering. It would appear that even declaring yourself a feminist is transphobic. Here's a question; if a person with a penis who self identifies as a woman then rapes a woman, could a smart defence lawyer get the rape charge reduced to sexual assault on the basis of the offender's self identification? ie a woman cannot physically rape a woman?