I know there are those of you who believe, contrary to any evidence, that the purpose of religion is to amass great wealth and power. In the case of Latin America, it wasn't the Church that assassinated Archbishop Romero. I know that there are Gransnetters who, because of their own bad experiences or perceptions extend these to the entire church (or whatever). However, there are many people who do not share these views. Among them is a large group of eminent businessmen who think they can learn something from the Roman Church about business values and ethics - not about acquiring wealth. I do not think the messages I have been posting are any more, or less, controversial than those with anti-religion, anti-church themes which are what first caught my attention on Gransnet. Unless someone out there thinks that pro-religion comments are intrinsically controversial?