rosequartz Inheritance Tax is not payable until a single person or, in the case of a married couple, the remaining spouse dies - it does not financially penalise the owner of the property in any way. It is payable after his/her death and therefore only affects what the beneficiaries receive. I expect all of us want to leave something to our children but surely £650,000 - never mind £1 million - is enough? They will still retain 60% of any amount above that threshold.
Liike you and many other Gransnetters, we have also paid stamp duty, 14.5% interest on our mortgage, etc. etc., but WE paid it - not our children - and while we wish our children to inherit our estate, we believe that if the value of our property exceeds the threshold then it is quite right that Inheritance Tax be payable.
Meanwhile, a growing number of working people may not be able to get a state pension until they are 68. The majority of them will not benefit from a substantial inheritance. Many of them are paying extortionate rents which prevent them from ever being able to save to buy a home of their own. This concession to the better off will decrease the tax intake and inevitably affect the less well off. It is just unfair.
Figures from the Office for National Statistics show that 50% of those that receive an inheritance receive less than £10,000 and only 1 in 10 beneficiaries inherit £125,000 or above. It is also stated that "Rates of inheritance were higher for individuals living in households which already had the highest level of wealth".
This is echoed in an article in The Economist:
Many people pay lip service to meritocracy but get very het up about inheritance taxes, or death taxes as they like to call them. It is often said that inheritance taxes represent double taxation but in many cases that isn't true; for middle-class people, their biggest asset is usually their home on which capital gains tax is not paid. Similarly, business owners only pay capital gains tax when they sell; by definition, if they are passing a company on to their heirs, they have not sold
If one assumes that an economy functions best if the most talented people rise to the top, then inherited wealth rigs the deck. There is a lottery effect; if your parents owned property, or die early (before they spend their savings on nursing care), then you have a big advantage over others who may be just as hard-working or talented. Wealthy people already pass on a lot of advantages to their children; they can afford better education, and a better environment at home (more books, quiet places to study etc)
History, as well as fiction, suggests that being born to inherited wealth is not normally a spur to greater effort; instead, life is devoted to social display or indolence. The world hardly needs a new class of Bertie Woosters