None of it is about religious expression. As a teacher I worked with many Muslim ladies, in the role of bilingual assistants. I was assured by many that the Koran, like the Bible, merely states that both men and women should dress modestly. The idea of what is modest is different in different cultures. So most Arab women dress in western clothes, but cover up whilst out of the house in an abaya, or similar, sometimes just just a long black coat. However women from Pakistan or Bangladesh, will wear a salwar kameez, because this doesn’t show the shape of the female form, and again they will wear a long coat or cardigan when out of the house. They only cover their hair when with men who are not family members, therefore outside. I was also told that girls to not need cover their hair at all before puberty, and that women only need cover hair after they have made the pilgrimage to Mecca. Many choose to cover hair because they wish to, not because they have to. Whilst I worked with one lady who wore a hijab, most of the ladies used an extremely flimsy scarf, and others no head covering at all. Some of our Mediterranean ladies wore western clothing and no covering up at all. So it brings us back to the fact that covering up the hair is cultural, and different forms of coverings are used, or not used, according to where the family orginates from. The hijab for three year olds is a cultural, not religious, form of dress, and one I strongly do not agree with, because it sexualises young children, just as skimpy crop tops etc sexualise young children. I think it is a sad reflection of our society that both forms of dress are both sold and worn. Commercialism has brought many benefits, but it is a double edged sword, and it has also brought us many disadvantages. Hijabs for three year olds are one of them.