Katek both your last 2 posts have put your finger on the nub of the matter 1) that the 'good' technology is not necessarily as good as it states and ) that this child is being exploited by a movement that is vacuous in the extreme and devoid of any ideas bar shouting.
Gone girl I think very few of us have been mean or unkind about GT, but a lot of us have deep reservations about how a vulnerable child is being exploited and while, I fully understand her concerns, older people have been concerned and doing things to alleviate the problem for decades. Why have so many windfarms been installed, insulation levels in new build houses raised, banning the use of gas for space heating in new builds etc etc, everything from cars to dishwashers made more fuel efficient?
I am not suggesting that is sufficient nor being pushed forward fast enough, but GT has been hammering on an open door demanding to be let in. However strongly she feels, not one of her speeches has included any ideas about how what she wants can be achieved, I am not talking about carefully thought out plans and these are completely lacking from any of the organisations involved with her, but it would be nice to hear what she thinks we should do to reach the targets ER is setting, even if all she can come up with is wind farms and electric cars.
Her speech to the UN was great PR, but she wasn't talking to a conference of scientists committed to developing the technology to enable us to meet our emission reduction targets, headed David Attenborough and a slew of Nobel Prize winners and commanding the media. She was talking to load of government leaders (like BJ) who think that posturing at this conference is good for their home media. But as wriggly as eels when it comes to making any commitments.
Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro, the main environmental villains did not even bother to attend. Nothing will come from this conference but hot air and pius unkept promises.
In her various speeches, she has said nobody had done anything yet to combat global warning
and blamed the pursuit of economic growth. The need for more money to be put into research and investment into pioneering projects (like the South Wales tidal power lagoons) has never once featured in any of her speeches that I have seen reported. And this is what is needed.
Grammaretto, I am shocked that it needed an ER demonstration to wake your teenage GC to the problem of global warming. What on earth have their parents and schools been up to? Do your DGC not use social media?
My DGC's primary school has been covering the subject of global warming for several years and the children have been actively involved in intiatives in the school and elsewhere to reduce energy consumption. Even if the school had done nothing the message would be being learnt at home.