why shouldn't a cricket club make it easy for those catering by the default menu being vegan? They will have to cater for those with say coeliac or Crohn's, or those with a life-threatening allergy, a vegan meal should be suitable for most apart from those with medical needs, many cricket clubs in some parts of the country would need Halal and that should ensure that everyone can eat together, that they feel welcomed and accepted. And letting anyone with special needs know what is in the food is a basic humanitarian requirement so they can work out for themselves if they might suffer an anaphylactic shock
In days gone by ham sandwiches were so special that it was a matter of pride that you buried someone with ham
No one is going to become malnourished by eating a vegan meal once a week
In recent years some schools have hatched out chicks, and children have been told that they have been returned to the farm afterwards. Doing it on a personal scale this may be true, but in many cases, this is just not true, the cockerels are slaughtered, and the pullets too if no one comes forward to rescue them. IT is right to publicise to all the horrific conditions that factory-farmed hens are kept in, so that people know and opt for humanely reared chickens and ethically produced eggs.
In my experience, the people that just feed the vegetables to a vegetarian child living with them are the ones who would be to blame for not ensuring that they are well-nourished, in the same way, that they would be to blame if a child suffered because they would not adapt to a diet needed for medical reasons. I've heard of schools in the past giving children with coeliac or Crohn's food with ingredients that cause flare-ups, it's not the school that is up in the night with a child in pain, and they do not seem to realise that over the years all these flare-ups cause long-lasting problems
If you'd adapt your cooking for your grandma or father who suffers with indigestion if they eat a certain food item, why would you not adapt your cooking so that your child can eat things that will not harm them physically or upset them because of their principles
I'm personally not a vegan or a vegetarian and in fact the family do keep livestock in as humane a way as possible. I want to know that the animals who provide any animal products I do eat have suffered as little as possible. In our family in different generations, there are people who don't eat things for either health reasons or because the food makes them gag...I'd not deliberately serve a family member something that they did not like, would cause health problems or that they could not eat because of ethical reasons even if I didn't agree. But we've always managed to get everyone fed with things they will or can eat, without affecting diabetic aunt Annie or uncle dave with gout, or grandma who is up all night with indigestion if she eats xy or z and it's never been a problem. If you won't do that for your child that is being ageist and neglectful. Even the queen I undesetand lets hosts know what she doesn't eat and if she came to see you you'd ensure that you kept to her requirements. If I want to eat unethically produced items that would cause a family member to have an anaphylactic shock, or dripping sandwiches or bacon butties I can do that out of the home can't I or do it when the those who don't eat them aren't there
We used to have cookery classes in school, and we used to study nutrition, taking other considerations into account is just an offshoot of this surely
Last letters make new words - Series 3
So it begins….. Streeting resigns
