Bel Mooney

I really am fed up of that pop up now. I assume gransnet know about it because it’s the same colour as their logo. There is no way that I’m going to click onto it and answer the question.

Lucca

MayBee70

Is anyone else getting a pop up asking them if they agree with the rules of six’?

Yes. It stayed for ages.

Yes, very annoying, it kept blocking other things I wanted to read.

I refuse to join you in your silly spat. And I forgive your rudeness. I bet you wouldn’t speak to me in this manner in real life.

Keyboard warriors eh?

What ever happened to politeness? It’s not difficult - and if you try it you might like it (and feel better about yourself sw).

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Why so bitter tonight sw? It’s nicer to be kind.
?

Urmstongran

Your just sore about the vote last night sw but you’ll get over it. Hence why you’re passing such mean comments to me.

Keep going Urm you’re really on top form. Very impressive . Well done.

There you go! Your comment has just made my day Oopsminty
?

I keep getting that pop up

And I had no idea that Bel was married to a Dimbleby

MayBee70

Is anyone else getting a pop up asking them if they agree with the rules of six’?

Yes. It stayed for ages.

Me!

Is anyone else getting a pop up asking them if they agree with the rules of six’?

Your just sore about the vote last night sw but you’ll get over it. Hence why you’re passing such mean comments to me.

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I think she was probably reflecting the feeling of upset most of us felt when it hit us this could mean reorganising Christmas, having to change the family traditions of decades, but I think most people once they had given themselves a few minutes to think about it, accepted that if it lasted that long, it would be because it was necessary and calmed down and started replanning the festive season, with the Rule of 6 in mind.

Belle Mooney may well herself had a rethink. I must say I felt a bit like her at first, but not for long.

Ah sw stop it with the po-face. I can post if I like ... and I even got a response so there!

Sorry I meant Johnathon Dimbleby.

What’s that got to do with anything Urm? We’re having a serious discussion here, not gossiping

I believe it was Richard Dimbleby Urmston

Wasn’t she married to David Dimbleby?

I haven't made that leap "maddyone*. Trisher asked if my previous post was directed at her.

It was directed at anyone (I said anyone) who deliberately takes action that they know will spread the virus.

I’m not defending the numbers (but I would the principle) but I am criticising for the nth time a spoilt entitled selfish stupid columnist who is boasting about her plans to break the law - she had the option to criticise the policy [ along with evidence of. course ) but no she had to had to do a look at me I’m going to break the law. How do you defend that?

It is never as simple as one gathering
Trisher It can be. Google ‘superspreader events’ if you’re interested.

Why would anyone assume Trisher is going to deliberately engage in actions that will spread the virus? That’s making a massive leap from what she has said.

trisherif you or Bel Mooney or anyone deliberately takes action which is known to spread the virus, you don't care.

Whatever you might say. Actions speak louder than words.

maddyone

I don’t support BM but I do think Trisher has made some very valid points.

So do I. I am law abiding by nature and upbringing, but do want to feel that the laws by which I abide are sensible and that I understand the need for them (or if I don’t understand that the person making the laws understands the reasons for them).

In this case, I really don’t. We are led by donkeys. Self- interested, incompetent, dangerous donkeys. At what point do we say that enough is enough?