Gransnet forums

AIBU

AIBU to be concerned that my State Pension is referred to as a 'Benefit'?

(105 Posts)
Scribbles Mon 01-Apr-24 16:39:26

DWP have been referring to SP as a "benefit" for at least 10 years! I've always felt there must be some dark motive behind the name change.

Judy54 Mon 01-Apr-24 16:31:20

I agree with you Jess20. When you receive information about what your state pension will be this year it clearly states benefit which to me is totally inappropriate.

TinSoldier Mon 01-Apr-24 16:21:49

This has been discussed many times and at length.

Read these official documents ...

petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/121267

... and this ...

www.gov.uk/government/publications/fighting-fraud-in-the-welfare-system/fighting-fraud-in-the-welfare-system--2

Jaxjacky Mon 01-Apr-24 16:10:59

Where have you seen this please, do you have a link? Thanks.

Jess20 Mon 01-Apr-24 15:37:49

Surely the State Pension isn't a benefit but an Entitlement? The government has, I believe, started counting the SP under the umbrella of 'benefits' and making the costs look larger than they otherwise might. Is this to soften up the population so cutting back on benefits can include those of us on SP - eg means testing them in future amongst other things? I'm sure I've rambled or ranted about this sort of thing before but recently, given how being in receipt of a benefit allows the government, or some private company that does it's bidding, to sectetly check out what's in our bank accounts without needing to either ask permission or inform us if the fact, it feels a bit sinister. I think I read somewhere (sorry not to provide a link) that it's now it's state pensioners who are amongst the biggest benefit cheats, scamming the system by claiming pension credit when not entitled as they have too much in savings or being out of the country too long etc... I am concerned in particular after seeing how those involved in the great Post Office Counters scandal gave the accused no credible chance of defense against accusations of dishonesty and criminality. Are we the next target - after the election of course as they won't want to scare off a large part of their voter base. So, is this relabelling the thin edge of the wedge or am I getting concerned about nothing?