Gransnet forums

AIBU

To think that London, or anywhere else for that matter, does not belong to any one demographic

(829 Posts)
TerriBull Fri 19-Apr-24 10:46:31

An openly Jewish man wearing a skull cap was trying to cross the road where a pro Palestine march was taking place. He was stopped by a Met Officer who threatened to arrest the man for breaching the peace because of his openly Jewish appearance. He was merely trying to cross the road. Yes tensions run high amongst these demonstrations, but this person is a citizen going about their daily life. Why should the onus be on him to disappear, surely that onus should be on the demonstrators not to target individuals to take out any grievances. Possibly the Officer was trying to head off any clashes, but I think there is something worryingly wrong and discriminatory in telling a demographic, any demographic, they are not free to move about on the streets of their own country.

Your thoughts on the matter.

Wyllow3 Fri 19-Apr-24 12:20:07

Reference to DM article above
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13326969/Campaign-Against-Antisemitism-Gideon-Falter-threatened-arrest-Jewish-pro-Palestine-march-London.html

Anniebach Fri 19-Apr-24 12:31:06

‘At the moment you are quite openly Jewish’ this is acceptable?

Oreo Fri 19-Apr-24 12:32:32

Witzend

I’m afraid it’s officially seen as fine and advisable to pander to certain minorities, especially the more vocal, demanding ones, while those who largely mind their own business, can go hang.

This, absolutely.

Ilovecheese Fri 19-Apr-24 12:44:30

Anniebach

Ramadan celebrated in London with lights , at Easter

What is wrong with that?

Namsnanny Fri 19-Apr-24 12:44:54

It's consistent confirmation that freedom of movement and freedom of speech are being eroded, in this country and most of the west. Very very worrying

Namsnanny Fri 19-Apr-24 12:46:20

Sorry my post was to quote oreo and witzend

Germanshepherdsmum Fri 19-Apr-24 12:47:34

Anniebach

‘At the moment you are quite openly Jewish’ this is acceptable?

In this context, yes. That was what could have provoked violence on the part of some marchers. The policeman was there to prevent trouble.

Rosie51 Fri 19-Apr-24 12:52:19

Germanshepherdsmum

Anniebach

‘At the moment you are quite openly Jewish’ this is acceptable?

In this context, yes. That was what could have provoked violence on the part of some marchers. The policeman was there to prevent trouble.

In which case they are absolutely confirming that these marches have a large anti-semitic focus. Being obviously Jewish does not indicate being pro Israel and anti Palestine.

biglouis Fri 19-Apr-24 12:52:21

Well I think it "shocking" that at the height of the lockdown British citizens were forbidden to go out unless they could show they were exercising, shopping, or journeying to care for a vulnerable person. Yet a crowd of so called asylum seekers were allowed to stage a protest about food and wifi. They were actually guarded by police in case anyone uset them. Had the police not been there I think they would have got rough justice from the onlookers.

ferry23 Fri 19-Apr-24 12:55:05

"openly Jewish"...

... is that the same as "openly black" or "openly a woman" or "openly gay" or "openly French"?

Or are you now supposed to hide your affiliation to any religion? Maybe like Jews had to hide away under the Third Reich - or during the Spanish expulsion. Or any other regime that sought to eradicate them.

This is as bad as labelling Jews with a yellow Star of David. Anti Semitism dressed up as protection. Disgraceful.

Wyllow3 Fri 19-Apr-24 12:58:12

Anniebach

‘At the moment you are quite openly Jewish’ this is acceptable?

No.

And police should arrest hate crime speech or actions from the minority of demonstrators.

eazybee Fri 19-Apr-24 12:59:02

I have just seen this on the news, and that Police officer concerned definitely does not have a clear understanding of his duty. He is clearly identifiable so will be removed from duty forthwith until he has been re-trained. and the accompanying officers also .

Possibly?

vegansrock Fri 19-Apr-24 13:01:23

The police have got an impossible job - hundreds of vociferous protesters versus one man who may be seen as provocative by the protesters. Of course the protesters are in the wrong here - but if there are only one or two officers in that moment it would make more sense to remove the man from the situation, since removing the protesters would be impossible without riot squads. Of course everyone should be free to walk the streets, but many women choose not to walk alone after dark, for example, when it should be violent men who should be prevented from being out at night.

tickingbird Fri 19-Apr-24 13:07:35

ferry23

It’s becoming rather scary how this is so casually accepted. It would never be accepted the other way round.

maddyone Fri 19-Apr-24 13:15:30

This is the third example of antisemitism displayed by the police.

1) an Iranian man carrying a placard saying Hamas is terrorist arrested by police

2) a Jewish woman, press I think, who remonstrated with police that a placard sporting a swastika should be removed from the march, and was told that swastikas have to be taken in context

3) the incident on Saturday where one Jewish man was thought to be provoking trouble because he was openly Jewish which meant he was wearing a kippah on Saturday, the Jewish sabbath day

This is an extremely worrying development in my view. One group, who are actually the potential troublemakers, being supported, whilst a tiny minority of society is seen as being the troublemakers. This is not impartial policing. Sir Mark Rowley needs to examine his conscience and also to take a course in impartial policing.

Wyllow3 Fri 19-Apr-24 13:16:58

The man concerned (see Daily Mail article above) was there with a point to make:

www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=gideon+Falter&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

Its a relevant one, but is it the best way to call out anti-semitism?

maddyone Fri 19-Apr-24 13:18:10

There should be no antisemitism in the police.

Germanshepherdsmum Fri 19-Apr-24 13:24:05

This was a man with an agenda I think. And who just happened to film it?
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/19/police-threaten-jewish-man-arrest-palestine-protest-london/

Nicenanny3 Fri 19-Apr-24 13:29:14

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.

petra Fri 19-Apr-24 13:29:52

I’m afraid to say that you’re expecting too much from the Met.
I doubt if the majority of the bobbies on the beat could pass an iq test.
I know that there are exceptions but they really are thick.

Wyllow3 Fri 19-Apr-24 13:35:13

It is complicated.

The demonstrations started primarily to draw attention to to plight of many Palestinians who live in Gaza without adequate or any food, water, housing. As quoted above, there are Jewish groups who take part in the demonstrations because they oppose the current regime in Israel. Their voices have a right to be heard also.

But I oppose deliberate and provocative anti semitic extremism which has also been seen. However, the subtleties not to mention the needs of the starving have been lost if you present all the demonstrators as Hamas supporters.

Sigh. I have no "right" answers.

maddyone Fri 19-Apr-24 13:42:37

Germanshepherdsmum

This was a man with an agenda I think. And who just happened to film it?
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/19/police-threaten-jewish-man-arrest-palestine-protest-london/

He may have had an agenda GSM but maybe the point he was making needs to be made. As I said previously, this is not the first time people in support of the Jews have been discriminated against by the police, and it is worrying.

I think the pro Palestine marchers have an agenda too.

Anniebach Fri 19-Apr-24 13:45:08

It is not complicated, a man was prevented from crossing a
road in London because he is a Jew,

Anniebach Fri 19-Apr-24 13:46:36

Lily Ebert is so right, ‘it’s happening now’

Wyllow3 Fri 19-Apr-24 13:53:02

Anti-muslim hate crimes have also seen a rise.

"Tell Mama, which monitors and campaigns against anti-Muslim sentiment and abuse in the UK, told PA Media that “levels of anti-Muslim hatred and discrimination are deeply worrying, impacting trust in authorities and their sense of identity and belonging”.

Iman Atta, the organisation’s director, said there had been a significant spike in anti-Muslim hate since the atrocities on 7 October. He added: “The nature of many offline cases sent to our service is often overtly racist – targeting Arab and Palestinian communities with dehumanising slurs, anti-Muslim slurs or in some cases targeting their homes, or when speaking Arabic in public, as well as targeting Muslim communities across all ages and gender.

*“We should never allow such hatred and intolerance to take root in our communities and at this time, please look out for each other, whether Muslim or Jewish. We must stand together against intolerance, hate and racism.”"*

www.theguardian.com/news/2023/dec/29/many-police-forces-in-uk-recorded-rise-in-antisemitic-offences-after-start-of-israel-gaza-war

Interfaith groups are quietly trying to work away to bring people together.