M0nica
If he was unable to get travel insirance this suggests that there were reasons for not being able to get it, so he knew he was at risk and still took the holiday.
It's difficult to know for sure that what you are reading is factual (I've just looked at the Mirror - it has less 'pop-ups').
Very many years ago now my late ex was involved in an incident that was reported in the national press. He was interviewed by a news reporter from the Telegraph. When we read the piece in the newspaper, we were both shocked at the way what he had actually said had been interpreted by the reporter. They even managed to get his job description wrong - they reported that he was a "Baker" - when in fact he was a Thames Waterman & Lighterman - which was the very reason why he was being interviewed (the Marchioness disaster). I'm now very suspicious of anything I read in the media.
So according to the Mirror this man was not able to get travel insurance which implies that he obviously tried but couldn't get cover. But again, was this because he perhaps only tried one insurer - or did he try them all and no-one would cover him?
His daughter appears to think he's being held hostage until at least half the bill has been paid, is dubious, or seems to be, about the diagnosis and treatment he's received, and is slating the British Embassy for not offering to help - only suggesting crowdfunding.
She's admitted (according to the Mirror) that "we know he shouldn't have gone and we can't be held accountable for his choice, but he's our dad and we need to do everything we can to get him home".
... but the article is short on facts. Was he un-insurable or was the premium too high? The details of his health condition, current diagnosis, and treatment are, rightly, confidential - but this allows the daughter to make all kinds of accusations against the hospital.
I feel quite sorry for the family - again, according to the Mirror, they don't own their own houses so can't take out any equity in their homes. They don't have £thousands in the bank. Crowdfunding is their only option.
It's a mess. And though I obviously don't wish this man to suffer, and hope he can be brought home - if he were my dad, I'd be absolutely furious that as an un-insurable individual, he'd decided to go on holiday anyway. That's if it's true. But either way, he acted completely out of self interest with no thought for his daughters and son. I almost feel tempted to donate because I feel so sorry for his offspring.
... but, did they know he was going without insurance, did he tell them, did they encourage him, "go on Dad, you'll be fine, you only live once" kind of thing?
Who knows - and that's the problem. I'm never sure that what I'm reading is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth!