I heard a little of the debate in parliament and the one comment that stuck out, for some reason, was that of Cln. Bob Stewart.
He said he had soldiers who joined the army at 16 but they are not allowed to fight in combat until the age of 18 . Why should someone of sixteen be allowed to vote to send soldiers to fight, something like that.
If the reasoning is ' well they pay tax, they should be allowed to vote', would it follow in that case they should at 16 also be legitamitely be able to fight in combat, drink alcahol and drive on the roads ??? Once the goal post is moved it sure as hell will have some nasty little issues rear their ugly heads in the future, not for the good in my opinion.
I can only say when I was 16 I had no idea about politics. I voted for a party because my dad did. The 16 year olds I know have not a clue about politics. I think there are dangers of indoctrination too in establishments like schools.
So no I definately am opposed to 16 year olds being used as political fodder.