Gransnet forums

Chat

According to Geraldine...........

(67 Posts)
j08 Wed 13-Feb-13 23:15:00

we should all be going out and getting jobs. A second career would be good for us.

#bogoffG #likemybed

j08 Fri 15-Feb-13 18:41:57

Well, that's it exactly gracesmum. Those rich people have someone to do all the menial stuff for them. Just couldn't see the point in mentioning them in the same article as the majority of ordinary older people.

gracesmum Fri 15-Feb-13 18:32:52

What does Alex Ferguson do anyway ? I could sit on a touchline and shout abuse at football players - easy! There will always be people who are able to work at a punishing pace at an advanced age (The Queen??) They are fortunate in their genes and to love what they do (I assume she does) But try to find or stay in paid employment and that is a different matter. I saw that lovely Pakistani man who worked at Kings Cross station on a TV prog earlier in the week. He wept at retiring - I'll bet he was obliged to retire. Mental ageing may well be held at bay by staying mentally and professionally active, but even then - look at people like Harold Wilson, Margaret Thatcher or Ronald Reagan who had no control over their own forms of dementia. We all age - but not always in the same way and not always in a steady decline -if you are like me, I ticked along feeling too young to retire for 2 years beyond retirement age and then over a period of about 3 months realised that actually I was not coping as well as I had done before. Or you find an illness, even flu, knocks you back and you don't "bounce back" like you would have done 10 years earlier.
Or, you find yourself going on and on and on at length....................gringrin

soop Fri 15-Feb-13 16:58:30

I totally agree with jings. My body started to tell me to ease-up when I hit 65-ish. It now tells me to tick-over, find time to relax, enjoy a wee spin on the exercise bike and cope with a multitude of niggles [some of which make me want to weep]...then my mind takes over, and I come on to GN for understanding and support from people who know what they're talking about...hmm

j08 Fri 15-Feb-13 16:56:47

Yes. Exactly.

I guess I am talking about the majority.

JessM Fri 15-Feb-13 16:48:16

People vary so much in what they are physically or mentally capable of at all ages jo8 Hard to generalise.

j08 Fri 15-Feb-13 16:42:27

But in the article you seem to be talking about people over the age of sixtyfive, not fifty. You say, "All the research on healthy longer lives shows that the more engaged and involved we feel, the better we age, physically and mentally"

No. Ageing doesn't really work like that. Just wishful thinking. Doesn't make any difference how "involved" you feel. When your body starts to age it does just that. And there's nothing you can do to stop it.

It's just not realistic to think that people of Alex Ferguson's, or any of the other's age, could hold down jobs in the real world. I suppose if the job was completely cerebral, sitting in front of a keyboard all day, then yes, possibly. But how many jobs are really like that?

But I know it's just an article to pad out a newspaper. So never mind. smile

GeraldineGransnet (GNHQ) Fri 15-Feb-13 15:19:03

j08 (sorry, I'm going on a bit here) My point about those people (David Attenborough et al) was that they have a lot of autonomy and really rewarding work to do. Those are two of the things that make people enjoy their lives, whether what they're doing is paid or unpaid. I wasn't suggesting supermarket checkouts were in the same league - though for some people working in supermarkets may be enjoyable.

But given that we are reaching the end of the time when we can pay for people to stop working at 50 and live until 90, we need to stop writing people off as "too old" at 55.

Lullydully (I really will shut up after this) I wasn't suggesting people should carry on their jobs to old age - rather the opposite, that longer lives give us the chance to have a second act. That may well be as grandparents or focusing on our families and relationships.

GeraldineGransnet (GNHQ) Fri 15-Feb-13 15:04:05

Movedalot I don't at all think that people have to be employed to be engaged and involved. Employment for many people is an unfulfilling grind and life post-retirement is much more enjoyable and rewarding.

I was really making a plea - given the massive shift that is going on - for us to think more imaginatively about how we structure work over a lifetime. I completely agree that when you are older, the desire for meaningful, enjoyable things to do is strong - stronger perhaps even than when you're young. It's exactly that feeling that as a society we should be able to honour, respect and make use of, whether for money or not.

JessM Fri 15-Feb-13 14:57:50

I have sat next to a female manager and talked her round to the idea that a woman of 58 is a perfectly good person to hire, if she happens to be the best candidate. She was looking for reasons not to. e.g maybe she wont stay long.
Even though she is neither a bad person, nor would she think herself prejudiced. Unconscious discrimination is rife.

gracesmum Thu 14-Feb-13 23:10:42

I'm glad you agree with me - I felt I was being a voice in the wilderness. Although I am retired now I "got in" by the skin of my teeth so to speak.
We are stuck between a rock and a hard place - one group say we all have to work longer, blah blah blah and the others say we are over the hill at 40! Can't win!
Also glad to bump this thread up as it seemed to have disappeared while its lookey likey is up there near the top! grin

Lilygran Thu 14-Feb-13 16:37:17

Actually, gracesmum, that's a very important point. For many people in their 50s and 60s who want to work, the opportunity isn't offering. And people in that age group are often pushed out because they are more expensive to employ.

soop Thu 14-Feb-13 14:07:25

...and Rory gonnaballs would agree...if he could!

soop Thu 14-Feb-13 14:06:44

Bollocks...angry

gracesmum Thu 14-Feb-13 14:03:24

Just tell that to Phoenix and smoluski (and others I may not know about) who are trying their socks off to get jobs and are facing a hidden agenda of age discrimination angry

j08 Thu 14-Feb-13 13:54:22

Yes. All very 'ordinary' people Rosey. And doing such worthwhile jobs.

There've been a lot of articles, tweets, etc re the Pope resigning, but this one plumbs the depths! IMO

LullyDully Thu 14-Feb-13 12:18:44

Worked since leaving college in 1970. Went to part time at 60 {such a good idea} then finished at 62. Had enough of the classroom. I did enough and loved the job most of the time.

In retirement have a lot of time with GC- they have lived with us for nearly 4 years. When and why would I work? I do not know how teachers are going to work with little children until 67 {without throttling the little dears.} I am sure it must be the same for nurses. Enough is enough thank you........ back to the virtual party.

Roseyk Thu 14-Feb-13 12:12:00

Thank you for that jo8 I read it and thought that it would e good to copy and paste the best bit for all to see and encourage.

Alex Ferguson is dominating the Premier League at the age of 71

Warren Buffett is outsmarting the stock markets, wisecracking as he goes at 82.

Mary Berry is enthusing the nation's bakers and despatching our soggy bottoms at 77

81-year-old Rupert Murdoch's tweets are obsessively parsed for clues to his corporate strategy.

The Queen topped the Woman's Hour Power List at 86.

j08 Thu 14-Feb-13 11:41:59

I am off out for a long walk now (I am still trying!) and I wouldn't have time for that if I was sitting at a supermarket checkout all day. Noble as that would be, I'm sure.

j08 Thu 14-Feb-13 11:38:56

In my younger days we were made to feel guilty about being SAHMs (stay at home mums) by stupid magazine/newspaper articles. Now it seems it's going to follow us into our old age. hmm

Riverwalk Thu 14-Feb-13 11:32:20

"Bring on those second acts" she says

That is, if you're not knackered after 40 years on the first!

Fluff is right.

I agree with jo8 about exercise not warding off old-age. I know any number of people who were very fit and health-conscious, now crippled with arthritis, bad back and other ailments.

nightowl Thu 14-Feb-13 11:24:27

Those of us who can retire need to remember how fortunate they are - our children's generation will not be so fortunate.

j08 Thu 14-Feb-13 11:18:37

And don't think because you exercise (go to the gym regularly?) will do anything to keep you out of trouble when this ageing thing cuts in - it won't!

I have walked/cycled miles in the course of my lifetime, and rarely found time to sit down for long, but that did nothing to stop the muscles in my back deciding to pack up on me now, leaving me breathless with the effort of walking upright.

Just you wait madam. It's all in front of you. hmm

Oldgreymare Thu 14-Feb-13 11:13:39

I feel I have always had 2 careers, teaching, for which I was paid, and being a wife and mother*... or is that 3 careers?
Then there's voluntary work, does that make 4? [Hmm]
Counselling family, friends, school children and their parents (5)
* which also involves catering (6) cleaning (7) taxi-driving (8).......
Come on GNs there must be more smile

j08 Thu 14-Feb-13 11:00:42

And actually the writer of the article hasn't got a clue about what it can feel like, physically, in later life, or how things can suddenly start to deteriorate quite out of the blue!

Write it again in another twenty years missus! hmm

And don't give the buggers any more ideas about our pensions. angry

janeainsworth Thu 14-Feb-13 10:58:13

The other thing to consider is the job market for young people.
In my profession newly qualified graduates now struggle to find jobs, so I feel no compunction about having retired.
I worked hard for my pension and now I'm enjoying being able to do all the things I never had time for, when I was working.
I'm also putting money back into the economy, going out for lunch, taking classes, taking public transport etc.
the most important thing though is having the freedom to visit my grandchildren whenever I want to - this would be very restricted if I was working as they all live a long way from me.