Gransnet forums

Chat

Home sweet home

(78 Posts)
Elegran Sun 23-Jun-13 10:15:21

Some of the developers' ideas of what is "affordable" are a bit exotic, though. I think they do that to get planning permission through. There are never enough small and simple houses built - it probably costs the developers comparatively little to make them a bit bigger and glossier and then put up the prices to more than compensate for their outlay.

Movedalot Sun 23-Jun-13 10:08:32

In this area and perhaps it is everywhere, when a developer wants to build more than a certain number of houses they have to include a percentage of 'affordable homes' (whatever they are!). I would have thought that this would eventually have a knock on effect on the numbers needing social housing, although it would take a long time.

Elegran Sun 23-Jun-13 09:57:19

A new thread for anyone interested in calmly discussing suggestions for workable and non-punitive ways of helping those who need social accommodation without making things worse for those who already have it.

For instance - anyone out there with knowledge of the relative costs of traditional newbuild, flat-pack, and renovation/conversion? Of the planning aspects of community creation on new/conversion sites? On marketing change to those who fear their support systems (for the able as well as the vulnerable) would be lost if they left their present homes?

The plight of those trying to raise families in bedsits goes without saying, as does the welfare of the most vulnerable. No need to expound on those, they are a given. What about the rest? They have rights and expectations too, and those include secure tenancy of the home they have created and a reasonably predictable and steady rent.

Will repeat part of this post on a new thread. I hope it will attract thoughtful posters.