Pogs has made a pertinent point that often occurs to me as well, I think the whole world needs to be involved in relocating refugees. I fully accept that many are just that, refugees fleeing for their lives, the recent pictures of those massing on the border of Macedonia showing very distressed children were particularly upsetting. The lines are blurred by the fact that among those leaving their homelands, some will be economic migrants and I just don't think that Europe can be expected to absorb all of those as well, and whilst the people at Calais might not number that many at any one time, they will indeed keep coming and what might appear to be a trickle at the moment could indeed become a massive surge as time goes by. I hasten to add that I am not making the assumption that all those at Calais are economic migrants, but some will be, and if they destroy their papers then it's pretty hard to make a judgement about individual situations.
Britain has often been accused by our European counterparts of wishing to cherry pick the terms and conditions of our member ship to the EU, but I think the migration crisis illustrates the disconnect among member states on how to deal with the seismic shift of populations in Africa and the Middle East. Undoubtedly Germany is taking more than their fair share 800,000 I believe this year and whilst it is a large country and no doubt that number can be distributed around, it's the year on year factor that is the imponderable, will that number, or possibly more arrive every year, is it sustainable to keep accommodating them and if they are economic migrants, what about the countries they leave behind with presumably aging populations with fewer and fewer young people to support them.
Germany is of course the richest country in the EU. Smaller Eastern Europe countries having varying attitudes I believe Slovenia has insisted they will only take a couple of hundred, Christians only as they don't have any mosques in their country and don't feel that Muslims would therefore be catered for. Of course, as yet, they don't have the successful economies of those in Western Europe, some of their reluctance to take more seems to be rooted in their desire to remain mono cultures,white and Christian.
As a country we have been criticised by our European partners for taking very few refugees and possibly they have a point, but we have added 3 million to our population in the past few years and anyone who lives in an urban area will know that we are struggling with housing and school places at the moment. They Mayor and Deputy Mayor of Calais have pointed out that many of the migrants perceive Britain as an El Dorado and that we should change that perception. There are many countries around the world that are still under populated, New Zealand, Australia, Canada. I was in Argentina a couple of years ago a huge country with only 40 million, suffering for a terminally mismanaged economy I know, it should be as rich as Canada it has a lot of natural resource and could be deemed to be under populated. I'm in agreement with POGS why do we not ask more of countries such as Saudi Arabia who could certainly give refuge to some of their fellow Muslims and China who are a constant presence in Africa these days