I think it is good that it is being highlighted in the media, hopefully it will make people think a bit more.
I do think the hospital situation is very different to the GP one. Hospital admin does seem to be rather chaotic and, because hospitals are paid per transaction, they are not as efficient as they might be. Some examples:
1) DH was sent an appointment for a bank holiday and a few days later got a letter changing it due to 'unforeseen events'
2) DH had a suspicious mole, was given a hospital appointment where it was removed and sent to the laboratory. Job done, A friend had a small growth on her eye, was sent to the hospital where they agreed she had a small growth and sent her away to wait for an appointment. It was a small matter to remove it so surely could have been done at the same time? I had a small growth in my mouth, hospital appointment came, doc agreed I had a small growth in my mouth, I had to wait for an appointment to go and have it removed. When this was about to be done I asked why it took 2 appointments, the answer was that the doc may have thought it was a different size to the dentist. What would have been the difference in treatment? None at all and that was the third person looking at it. My GP said the only reason was that the hospital got paid for both 'transactions'.
Sorry, gone off topic. I do think that there are parts of the NHS which could make efficiency savings.
Is Trump's Pointless War Still Rattling On And On And On.......



