I was taught, both at Primary and Secondary School , to eschew the use of the word Nice which was lazy and to seek a more precise/appropriate descriptive adjective. Consequently, every use of the word on Gransnet Forums, leaps out at me and makes my hackles rise. The only time I use the word is sarcastically, as in 'That was nice of her' when in fact is was rude, upsetting, or belittling.
Most older people were told to use ‘nice’ sparingly when in school.....but so wot! Nice had a different meaning two hundred years ago, but again...so wot! It’s better than using OTT words to describe enjoying a scone and cuppa for instance.?
Nothing wrong with nice fgs. We were just taught not to use the same descriptive word repeatedly, and to think of others. The most repeatedly used word I remember was lovely.
I can think of far worse crimes than using 'nice'. Sometimes it is just the most suitable word. Alternatives like "fantastic, amazing, marvellous" are much stronger. And of course, now we have 'awsome' which I have yet to use!
I guess teachers just want to extend pupils' vocabulary and that must be good.
My school had the same rule. Nothing could be ‘nice’.
We weren’t allowed to use ‘got’ or ‘somebody’ (had to be some*one*).There was also some arcane rule about using ‘what’ in conjunction with another word - ‘what was’ maybe?
I was also taught not to use nice if there is a better word but I agree with Calendargirl that people often use exaggerated words such as brilliant, awesome etc. for things that are quite ordinary and it irritates me. I'm happy to say nice.
I was told those things about the word‘nice’. I’ve decided in a world where everything is ‘amazing’ (I have nothing against the use of) that there is nothing wrong with describing something as nice.
As others have said, I too was taught not to use nice if better words could be chosen. I do use it however. What I object to are words such as brilliant, amazing, fantastic, awesome, and so on, being used completely out of context. Makes nice look quite harmless.