Meghan and Harry. Has anyone changed their opinion post Oprah?

Anniebach

Big difference between 24 hours and couple of hours, she fled from her home obviously in fear ,allegedly, and turned up at the Albert Hall , not even a tremor.

I have known several people who have taken their lives

I think you’ve missed the point I was trying to make.

Big difference between 24 hours and couple of hours, she fled from her home obviously in fear ,allegedly, and turned up at the Albert Hall , not even a tremor.

I have known several people who have taken their lives

Incidentally, another FACT has come to light and the plot thickens.

MM invested in a company making some sort of chocolate/tea/coffee substitute and Oprah was promoting it in October of last year. “Show me the money”!!

An Oscar winner couldn’t hide fear and panic , she was allegedly thinking of suicide but was such a good actress she put in her glad rags, loads of eye make up and greeted and beamed ? No way

I’ve known one person who committed suicide - he was sat in my kitchen drinking tea 24 hours before he killed himself. When he left, I said to dh that he seemed much better. He wasn’t an actor

Thank you IAM64 I only ask because it’s widely practiced in certain communities in this country but those among us that think the Guardian article is great and love it, would be loath to praise such an article if it appeared in another publication citing said practice in those communities. Funny that!

trisher

As has been pointed out many times on these threads (but only when it made a negative contribution) she is an actress.

Keep on batting trisher. I know we don’t always see eye to eye -but this is one of those rare occasions when we do.

trisher

As has been pointed out many times on these threads (but only when it made a negative contribution) she is an actress.

I thought she was only a starlet?

As has been pointed out many times on these threads (but only when it made a negative contribution) she is an actress.

They have doctors available 24 hours a day, she had to attend
the Albert Hall event because she was too frightened to stay home , she certainly hid her fears in a very short time.

Tickingbird - yes marriage between first cousins is unacceptable in many cultures. There is a higher risk of genetic, physical and mental health problems being passed to the children of those unions. Lots of research to back that up

Having had ‘significant MH input’ doesn’t rule out the possibility of a patient in crisis, under what they experience as intolerable stress, returning to bad coping mechanisms/. No matter how well informed they may be.
Alistair Campbell has been an interesting contributor to the discussions on MH that interview triggered. He says he now recognises that those dark suicidal thoughts in the night need to be shared with his wife a Fiona. Then with his psychiatrist the following morning. He didn’t know this in his 30’s, then he drank.

NellG

trisher it's also well known that he's had significant MH input for those issues and is an ambassador for MH and associated charities. He as well informed and connected about all this as many of us. I'm about as effed up mentally as it comes, it doesn't prevent me from being able to support other people or recognise when they need help. But that's me and I'd wager I'm a little less self absorbed than M or H.

He did yell at someone, “WHAT MEGHAN WANTS MEGHAN GETS” when she was having a paddy over the tiara’s and which one she wanted, so what stopped him from picking up the phone if she was so distressed. It doesn’t make sense.

Is marrying first cousins wrong then? Is that classed as inbreeding?

As far as I can discover via Google greeneyedgirl four English monarchs, in the last 200 years, married their cousins.

One of those didn’t have an heir. It’s hardly repeatedly breeding.

But I suppose it’s that exaggeration for effect that se3ms to be preferable to fact that passes for truth nowadays.

trisher it's also well known that he's had significant MH input for those issues and is an ambassador for MH and associated charities. He as well informed and connected about all this as many of us. I'm about as effed up mentally as it comes, it doesn't prevent me from being able to support other people or recognise when they need help. But that's me and I'd wager I'm a little less self absorbed than M or H.

But it wasn’t aimed at Archie Smileless as apparently the skin colour comment was made to Harry before they were even married.
That’s why I could easily believe that it was just a casual, throwaway remark in the way all families speculate on possible characteristics of any future children.

There is confusion over the timing though as although Harry said the comment was made before they were married Meghan claimed Harry told her when she was pregnant with Archie. Why would he do that?

Yet another thing which doesn’t add up.

They can only hope that Archie will be more forgiving of his parents than they've been of theirs Nell.

Smileless2012

But according to M and H all be it reluctantly from him Greeneyedgirl it wasn't concern about the bloodline that was mentioned, it was the colour of Archie's skin.

Poor little chap, I hope he never hears about this when he's older.

He's guaranteed to, his parents put it in the public domain. For his sake I'd have kept that private, but that was up to them. Meghan obviously thought it was better that the whole world heard her accusation.

Exactly Smiles - it's not as if digital files don't last forever is it and he wont be able to find out how his parents used that as a justification for there choices when they could just have easily kept it private between them, taken it up with the person in question and protected their own child from further toxicity...

NellG I believe it is an accepted fact that it is difficult for one member of a couple to provide support for the other's mental health problems if they are suffering difficulties themselves. H lost his mother at an early age, has a father who is noticably dysfunctional (however hard he tried) lived a very ordered and structured life in school and the army, and then was somewhat adrift. It's highly likely he had his own problems.
Greeneyedgirl love it!

But according to M and H all be it reluctantly from him Greeneyedgirl it wasn't concern about the bloodline that was mentioned, it was the colour of Archie's skin.

Poor little chap, I hope he never hears about this when he's older.

seamstress

If the RF are so dignified and magnanimous they should still support their children no matter what, even forking out of their own pockets for security - after all, they are still targets by virtue of their relatives. But no they want to pull up the drawbridge and cast those who don't toe the line adrift.

No they shouldn't. H&M had the option to stay and learn from the older members of the RF how to deal with this, they chose to leave and their choice was supported. Just not with money. The drawbridge is still down, the RF have made that extra clear time and time again, it is H&M who refuse to cross it.

My job as a parent is to love and support my children to become independent loving and supportive adults. Not clingy leaches who can never stand on their own two feet either emotionally or financially.

EMMF1948

timetogo2016

I like her even less than before.
Imo she is sly.

Same here, I didn't think it was possible to like her any less but it is!! Don't like Piers Morgan but I think he spoke for millions when he said he didn't believe a word she said. She is the centre of her own universe, she's dumped everyone along the way and she'll dump Harry, she'll keep the children, her meal ticlet for life, nannies will deal with them.

And she won’t let anyone or anything get in her way.

trisher

Using the term "narcissistic" to describe a woman who simply has her own aims and goals, and who changes her, and her family's life to make things better for them is about as misogynistic as you can get.

Rubbish! It can be used to describe men too.

Oh come on seamstress surely you don't really believe that they can't go away and be quiet because the press wont let them.

Why should the RF fork out of their own pockets for security? Had they remained working members of the RF they'd have had security and they knew they'd lose it when they left.

I haven't questioned the validity of M's claims she had suicidal thoughts, but I dismiss her claim that she asked for help and it was refused by 'the firm' and her own husband. That within hours of 'breaking down' she attended an evenings entertainment where she wept as soon as the lights went down, and yet was able to shake hands with the performers with her make up in tact, and not a red eye to be seen.

As for H making her go in such distress and 5 months pregnant because he was afraid to leave her alone, come off it.