Gransnet forums

Chat

harry and megan

(1001 Posts)
earnshaw Sun 16-May-21 12:14:56

I was so saddened by the interview with harry and megan , why would two people who have got exactly what they wanted are happy to create such pain for others

theworriedwell Mon 31-May-21 09:18:50

Anniebach

A mother doesn’t greet her child with a kiss and cuddle = cold and uncaring!

A mother who tells the world how disappointed her husband was when their new born baby was a boy yet also tells the world
they knew the sex of the child because of the scans = a loving
mother !

Yes I think that was very spiteful, particularly when it is clear they already knew he was a boy. It smacks of being so caught up in getting one over on him that the damage to the child is completely overlooked. Well I hope it was overlooked as if she did it realising how damaging and hurtful it would be to Harry then it is totally unforgivable.

Marriages breakdown, nothing very unusual in that, but children should never be used by parents.

Lucca Mon 31-May-21 09:06:05

Ah yes of course ixion ! I tried to remember

ixion Mon 31-May-21 08:41:45

Lucca

FannyCornforth I noticed it yesterday so how come if you search it is not there ? Weird.
I can’t remember what it was about. It wasn’t about harry and Meghan though and there are so many games threads which push bother threads off the last day thing that stuff inevitably gets missed. Ridiculous.

'Litter'
On the Coronavirus thread. Sunday 15.07.57.

Surely a H and M free zone?

25Avalon Mon 31-May-21 08:36:54

Grany that is rather a biased article from an organisation that has one agenda. To put the record straight The Duchy of Cornwall is privately owned. It was set up in 1337 by Edward 111 as a personal endowment for his son, The Black Prince. A charter ruled that each future Duke of Cornwall would be the eldest son of the monarch and heir to the throne.

I live next to Duchy land purchased after WW2 and interestingly my deeds show the owner of the land as registered with The Land Registry to be Prince Charles. It is a feudal organisation run as a modern profit making mechanism and not all of us approve of the way it treats its tenants who are mostly too scared to speak the truth for fear of the rent going up. PC is a hypocrite when it comes to development of Duchy land and his environmental ‘ideals’ Were the monarchy to be abolished I am uncertain as to what the legal rights would be particularly with land registered to Charles and there is a hell of a lot of it but difficult to find out. If you want to know go to whoownsengland.org and an article “ What land does the Duchy of Cornwall own?”

Lucca Mon 31-May-21 07:38:55

FannyCornforth I noticed it yesterday so how come if you search it is not there ? Weird.
I can’t remember what it was about. It wasn’t about harry and Meghan though and there are so many games threads which push bother threads off the last day thing that stuff inevitably gets missed. Ridiculous.

FannyCornforth Mon 31-May-21 07:27:00

Hello all.
I hear that earnshaw has started another thread.
Can someone tell me where to find it please? (Lord knows why I'm interested, I really should get out more...)
Do you think that it's because we're nearing the all important 1000 posts??

Calendargirl Mon 31-May-21 07:21:53

Perhaps Charles being married to Camilla for over 16 years has made him view fatherhood and grandfatherhood differently? Her relaxed input must have helped him to view life in other ways to how he was brought up.

Both William and Harry appear to have a good relationship with her, despite the past, which can only be for the best.

Grany Mon 31-May-21 07:14:15

Find out more www.republic.org.uk/the_real_duchy_of_cornwall

Grany Mon 31-May-21 07:05:42

Republic
@RepublicStaff
The Duchy of Cornwall isn't a private estate. It belongs to the nation. From its profits we pay Prince Charles more than £20m a year, almost as much as all the presidents and prime ministers in the world combined.

Anniebach Sat 29-May-21 21:37:05

Galaxy we all have opinions, trisher doubts Charles would know how to father children, I assume she wasn’t speak of sex,
I gave my opinion that a child who had an unhappy childhood
would want the opposite for his children .

I do not speculate about Diana, I have said several times I read
her book, listened to the Panorama interview and listened to the tapes recorded for the Morton Book.

Emily49 Sat 29-May-21 21:33:01

Anniebach

Really Galaxy ? I know nothing of the private lives of William
and Kate .

You / we “know” as much about the private lives of any of the royals, past and present. Much of it is speculation.

Galaxy Sat 29-May-21 21:23:37

Pretty much everything on this thread is speculation annie, we cant really know anything other than some very specific facts, it seems odd to question Trishers sources when pretty much everyone elses posts are speculation and our own interpretation.

Anniebach Sat 29-May-21 21:10:50

Really Galaxy ? I know nothing of the private lives of William
and Kate .

Anniebach Sat 29-May-21 21:08:42

Can it not be that a child who has a strict father would want to
be the opposite with his own children ?

Does every woman who had an unloving mother not be able to
love her child ?

trisher Sat 29-May-21 20:47:09

I haven't I think ridiculed Charles at anytime. I have a certain sympathy for him, but I doubt if he had any real comprehension of how to father children. His own father being domineering and his grandfathers not being in his life.

Thanks Galaxy. I'm quite used to being accused of many things I am not. In a spirt of kindness and consideration of course.

Galaxy Sat 29-May-21 20:35:29

Sorry trisher I now feel I am talking about you wink. That wasnt how it was meant.

Galaxy Sat 29-May-21 20:33:57

Hold on I thought the reason we knew all these things about William kate etc was because of insiders, is that not an acceptable source now. Good to know. I think that statement about trisher is utterly untrue.

Anniebach Sat 29-May-21 20:30:17

Yes trisher. but the article in your link , much are quotes from others . Unlike ‘Diana her true story’ which was ghost written by Diana.

It is well known Charles was a sensitive child and he is a sensitive man, for this he is ridiculed .

Phillip must have been concerned that his son was sensitive but
all those years ago there was no talk of boys being sensitive, many boys were told to toughen up. Yes the choice of school was wrong for Charles but again this was over 60 years ago.

I have said before, the Queen was plonked on the throne years
before expected, only 25 and still in the shadow of the abdication.

I listened to the interview, Charles and Dimbleby, he didn’t
speak of his marriage, just said he had an affair after his marriage had broken down. No one wants to believe him because it would be accepting Diana lied.

You trisher have much compassion for females but lack it
for males.

trisher Sat 29-May-21 20:02:31

Charles has spoken about how he hated school, and the treatment he received. www.vanityfair.com/style/2017/03/the-isolating-boarding-school-days-of-prince-charles

Anniebach Sat 29-May-21 13:18:53

Lucca no, I read and listened to what she said, unlike those who believe what insiders are reported to have said or those who watch The Crown.

Galaxy Sat 29-May-21 13:01:08

grin

Jabberwok Sat 29-May-21 13:00:22

In the same way as we know that she leant on William. An insider.

Lucca Sat 29-May-21 12:26:45

Anniebach

ttisher how do you know his family didn’t give support ?

In the same way as you know his mother caused much of his suffering I imagine.

Lucca Sat 29-May-21 12:25:31

Jabberwok “ Harry she spoilt and encouraged him to do as he pleased so long as he didn't get caught! ”

How on earth do you know that ?

Jabberwok Sat 29-May-21 12:18:29

Prince Charles and Princess Anne were not left soley in the care of Nannies when their parents were away, they were in fact left in the care of their grandmother, the late Queen Mother with whom P.C in particular had a special bond. It was she who he turned to during those Gordonstone years, as she made sure that she was living within easy reach during term time. As all children are different,Princess Anne clearly thrived on this upbringing ,Charles less so. Obviously things are done differently these days as is demonstrated in the way William and Catherine are parenting their three, but 65 years ago attitudes were very different and what would now be considered cold and uncaring, was then the norm. The Queen and Prince Philip were no different to any other upper class parents. I don't think Prince Charles would for one moment have even contemplated publicly trashing his parents still less his much loved grandmother, for his perceived childhood ills.

This discussion thread has reached a 1000 message limit, and so cannot accept new messages.
Start a new discussion