tictacnana
I’ve had a blue badge for nearly 30 years and have been disabled since early childhood. You have to have the higher rate of the mobility component of what is now known as PIPS. The paperwork for this is extremely complicated and invasive and some of the questions are near enough reliant on guesswork to answer. Eg. How far can you walk without feeling pain or breathlessness ? I had my payments stopped after a nurse’s assessment a couple of years ago. She said that her extensive examination showed that there was nothing wrong with me. My doctor gave the powers that be a little nudge, pointing out that after 65 years of physiotherapy, leg braces, special shoes and painful surgery, it was unlikely that my claim was bogus . All was restored, backdated and included an apology for any distress caused. I should add that despite my condition, I worked, even past retirement age, to support myself and my children . I’m sure that this government, like a lot of the general population , equates disability rights with laziness or a devious manipulation of the system. Okay .... rant over!
Sorry, but this is totally incorrect with regard to the issue of the Blue Badge. As previously state several times, you do not need to be on any benefit to qualify for a Blue Badge - they are issued purely on whether your disability is permanent and substantially affects your mobility. If you are in receipt of either standard or enhanced rate of the mobility component of PIP, you will automatically qualify for the badge without having to undergo a medical examination - this is the only difference and does not mean it’s the only way to be eligible. Many conditions, including mental health conditions, qualify for the Blue Badge if the condition is permanent and substantially affects mobility.
With regard to PIP, your assertion that it’s based on guesswork is incorrect. The questions on the application form may appear invasive but they are designed to give an overall impression of how your disability affects you on a day to day basis and also to allow the decision maker an insight as to how you personally, view your disability as well as referring to the assessment report. There are two rates of both care and mobility components and both are based on clearly defined eligibility criteria as to how claimants manage their day to day needs as well as mobility. The decision is based on observations of ability, manner of moving, pain, breathlessness and safety, during the assessment process. I’m glad your appeal was successful, but the outcome of the appeal would not solely have been based on medical evidence provided by your doctor - it would have entailed a complete review of your case by a different decision maker, taking into account all the medical evidence originally provided and any new evidence not used in the original decision. I’m not saying the process is perfect - far from it, and I too have reservations about the use of healthcare professionals who may not have much experience of the conditions they are being asked to assess and this flaw is reflected in the amount of people who take their cases to appeal and win.