Not sure if I am allowed to ask this on here.....

Galaxy you don’t go on at all!
And I certainly couldn’t accuse anyone of that!
I’m grateful for what you’ve told me about reporting.
And yes, MN have been very brave, and I applaud them too

Ah I am sure that will make him happy Marydoll.

He does Galaxy, but he is always very pleasant!
He could be the surrogate grandson, I never had! I suspect I am too old to be his mother!

He gets a bit of stick on MN does Michael but I think it's often when things are getting a bit tetchy and I dont really blame the moderators or the MN posters for that. They have to step a much more difficult line on MN I think.
Sorry fanny if I go on about how GN reporting works, I often defend them because MN and therefore GN have been very brave in terms of freedom of speech and womens rights so their prize is my loyalty

?

I'll bake him a ?

Oh dear, should we be talking about him, behind his back?

FannyCornforth

Michael seems very nice

I wonder if he likes ?
We used to bribe the old lot with a piece or two ?

Great minds Mary ?

Michael seems very nice

JaneJudge

No one has reported this otherwise Micheal may have appeared but I don't if it is the same Micheal that shouldn't be mentioned either

Michael always seems like a nice young man, Perhaps he is enjoying the thread too. ?

No one has reported this otherwise Micheal may have appeared but I don't if it is the same Micheal that shouldn't be mentioned either

Iam64

Do we conclude the current mods take a more relaxed view?

As Galaxy taught me a while ago, things only get deleted if they are reported.
Evidently no one has reported this

Not with his helmet then?
(Picture is Erica Roe)

Iam64

Do we conclude the current mods take a more relaxed view?

No, I think they're too busy on Mumsnet and they probably think we won't misbehave at our age ?

Galaxy

I do think you cant expect every rule to be listed. I once worked at an organisation where a volunteer took all their clothes off whilst volunteering, we didnt have that specific issue in the volunteer guidance but we thought it was a given.

There is no rule that a woman can't go shopping naked in town, it's not an offence and you couldn't call it public indecency because she had a lovely figure!

I remember a very young policeman running after her, taking off his jacket and placing it gently round her shoulders.

Do we conclude the current mods take a more relaxed view?

I know, Maggiemaybe. I didn't know whether to mention that, or not. RIP. J. She was funny, but outrageous.

When certain members were sent to the Doghouse, we were also told off for mentioning that. I have tried to back track and find the messages from GNHQ, but no success.

Jings?

She did, Marydoll. It was funny but I was so sorry to see her go (yet again). And then of course we lost her forever.

no way!

though I have received PMs which were meant to be on threads, so I shouldn't be so surprised

Lona

Freudian slip MD? ??

Probably! I am not the sharpest tool in the toolbox today.

One poster, who was banned and was being discussed on a thread, accidently outed herself, by posting a PM on the thread in error, instead of send sending it.

That did amuse me!

I do believe the ex member being discussed is back posting.
It’s very difficult to change your style and especially your phraseology.

Shinamae

I crossed sauce with her a couple of times but enjoyed reading her comments…

I really like “crossed sauce” and think I’ll use it instead of “crossed swords” from now on! ?

Freudian slip MD? ??

I can only talk from my own personal experience over the last seven years and can definitely confirm that we were old off for asking where a poster was.