This is not in reply to you, Miss A; but to the people saying they don't have sympathy for the man on the radio.
I think things are going to get pretty grim for a lot of people, but competitive misery isn't really fair. We may as well say that people here will be cold and hungry, but they aren't as badly off as a family in Ukraine being starved out of a basement, or an orphan slum child in Calcutta. The point is not that some people aren't as badly off as others, but that most people aren't going to have the spending power they are used to.
If someone is used to a lifestyle that involved going out regularly, and then finds they not only have to stop that but also cancel Netflix, so even staying in has been 'downgraded', they are going to feel it.
Objectively it's not as bad as someone doing without more basic things, but unless we acknowledge that it is still a change in circumstances we are saying that only the starving should complain.
As Babyshark says, they were probably chosen as a family with which the average R4 listener would identify. Also, whereas £60k would be lovely as a pension, it's just about average for a working couple; and as they are a dual-earner family then as well as a mortgage, they will be paying two lots of tax and NI on that, as well as childcare - it won't go anywhere near as far as a £60k salary for a single-earner family.