Oldnproud
I've started buying quick-cook (fusilli) pasta. It cooks in less than half the time of the normal one.
Admittedly, you still have to bring all that water to the boil first, but every little helps, and actually, I've found that I don't need to use as much water as I was previously using anyway.
I read in a cookery article yesterday that if you soak pasta in cold water for, I think 4 hours, it also cuts down cooking time quite drastically. You could then compare the price if “quick cook” with Regular - particularly if you buy the latter from one of those “fill your own container” shops.
From the DT yesterday
The cost of cooking
There’s no doubt that when it comes to cooking, pasta is a gas guzzler. Italian cooks recommend at least one litre of water and 10g of salt (a rounded teaspoonful) for 100g of pasta for each person. So, supper for four will mean bringing four litres of water to the boil. In my largest lidded pan on my most powerful gas burner (a 5kWh number designed for a wok), that took just shy of 20 minutes. Add in 10 minutes of cooking time, and allowing 7p per kWh, and that’s 17p. Not staggering, I grant you, but not that green, either – and if you are using electricity, it’ll be even more expensive.
The soaking method
It all sounded a bit student bedsit to me, up there with cooking a steak in a toaster (please don’t do this) or fish fingers and chips in a waffle maker. But in the interests of research, I soaked a portion of penne in salted cold water overnight in the fridge. The next day, I drained off the cold water, trying to ignore how depressingly flaccid the pasta looked, and tipped it into a pan. In went a kettleful of boiling water, then I brought it back to the boil before draining it again.
Amazingly, it worked, the pasta brightening and tightening before my eyes. Not as al dente as I’d like it – next time I’ll soak it for just four hours – but this could save time, money and a fugged-up kitchen