Northernlass
That’s an interesting statement about the cost MaisieD; could you explain it a bit more?
You mean the one about much of the money coming back to the Treasury as tax?
Leaving aside any revenue that might have been generated by TV rights etc. just think of all the aspects of the funeral, and the preceding day's events which would have had to be paid for. All the fuel for the cars and buses needed, and for all the people who made special journeys to cities or viewing points to see the hearse on its journey south or the proceedings in London. Then hire fees for transport. As MOnica said, the hospitality industry which must have fed and housed many of the participants. The cost of hundreds of barriers to line the routes, which I would imagine are probably hired, the printing of orders of service. It's all a bit overwhelming to try to think of everything, but everything provided which had to be paid for would have been provided by private businesses and their staff.
Much of this would have been subject to VAT, so that's a start. Then the businesses have to pay their staff, so income tax paid on that. Then when the workers spend their money there's tax on just about everything they buy. It goes on and on. You think of something, it is taxed somewhere along the line. The only thing that won't be taxed is anything anyone manages to save for spending later.
That is basically how the domestic economy works, it doesn't matter if the money is put in by the state, as it was for the Queen's funeral celebrations and the new King's receptions and memorial services to attend, or by 'investors' or whatever. All transactions involving payment to businesses or individuals will end up being taxed away at some point as it moves round the economy. And it all helps people to make a living.
I hope I haven't been too confusing with this explanation.