Gransnet forums

Chat

Charles may pay for Andrew's security

(234 Posts)
Smileless2012 Mon 19-Dec-22 22:08:21

He is not a convicted sex offender.

Deedaa Mon 19-Dec-22 22:08:17

Gagajo to be fair he is an alleged sex offender and therefore should probably have protection like anyone else.

nanna8 Mon 19-Dec-22 22:08:03

Can’t PA pay for his own security? Like anyone else would.

Casdon Mon 19-Dec-22 22:07:32

I think that the king has done the right thing, Andrew is no longer a senior royal, so the taxpayer shouldn’t pay for his personal security. If his brother is willing to pay for his security, that’s an issue for them to sort out between them - I’m not interested.

Galaxy Mon 19-Dec-22 22:02:43

I am a Republican, and loathe PA. But I think if you have a royal family the individuals within it need security, however unpleasant those individuals may be. It's another argument not to have a monarchy.

GagaJo Mon 19-Dec-22 21:46:00

BaBaBoom

Well if it's in the Daily Fail it must be true.

Yeah, I know. But really. We're protecting sex offenders now?

Perhaps he should go into witness protection instead?

BaBaBoom Mon 19-Dec-22 21:35:47

Well if it's in the Daily Fail it must be true.

annsixty Mon 19-Dec-22 21:35:11

Anyone ,regardless of their lifestyle/ misdemeanours should have protection if their life is threatened.
I abhor PA if he is guilty but think he is entitled to the same safety considerations as the rest of us.

GagaJo Mon 19-Dec-22 21:29:57

Don't know what to say about it really.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11553441/Prince-Andrews-armed-protection-police-replaced-private-security-officers.html