Use it or lose it. Obviously people who live out in the sticks or have health issues need their cars, but shouldn’t the powers that be encourage the rest of us to reduce our dependence on them? We leave the car at home whenever we can, and for as long as we’re able, we’ll walk to and from the bus stops, though the distances get longer as services are cut. Our local public transport network’s pretty dire, but the fewer people who use it, the worse it will get. Other, more enlightened countries, have slashed the price of public transport - it’s free across Luxembourg - and upped the frequency and efficiency. Here, the car is king, and we prefer to turn a collective blind eye to the many problems this causes. We have friends who take great pride in not having used a bus for 60 years - it’s obvious that they think most of those who do are some kind of underclass. We’re viewed as being a bit eccentric.
The sums add up too. A report from KPMG several years ago concluded that every pound spent on concessionary bus travel for older people generated, at that time, £2.87 of benefits for society and the wider economy. The same report found that scrapping free bus passes could cost the UK economy more than £1.7bn a year due to the probable decline in volunteering and poorer health among older people. The figures will be higher now.
This, as well as the obvious benefits to our environment of reducing car usage, is why the system should be widely expanded to other age groups, not scrapped. A good system of affordable public transport is one of the most obvious signs of a civilised society.