There is a thread on MN about a woman who is hosting a group of people on Boxing Day and had planned to serve veg lasagne. Her friends have suggested that she serves 'nibbles' instead, and most of the replies on the thread are also suggesting alternative menus. It got me thinking that we were brought up to take what we were given, be happy with it, and stay quiet if we weren't. I wouldn't dream of accepting an invitation and then trying to change the menu, but that sort of thing seems to be getting more commonplace, I think.
I host a regular meeting at my house, and when I offer coffee there is always someone who says they'd prefer tea, and do I have fruit tea - the berries one for preference? Or if I offer cake someone will say 'no thanks, but if you have a biscuit I'd love one'. Someone will ask for white sugar if I bring in brown, or ask for oat milk (which I don't keep in) - that sort of thing.
I mentioned this to my sister, who laughed and said that it wouldn't bother her in the slightest, and she'd rather people got what they wanted. Up to a point I agree, but I also think that it's rude, unless you are family or a close friend, and even then it needs judgement. Maybe there is just so much choice these days that we are used to asking for a skinny latte with an extra espresso or a spiced chai rather than 'coffee or tea'? I've never known people try to dictate a menu though. I always check in advance for dietary preferences, but then choose what to make with that in mind.
People may want to use something up, have a tighter budget that month, or want to try a new recipe - there are all sorts of reasons for choosing, and I think it should be up to the host what they offer, whether that's coffee/tea/wine, or lasagne/'nibbles'.
Any thoughts?