I am really shocked.
I live in the area where the Jesus People (as they were known here when we first came to this area, before they rebranded as the Jesus Army) were founded,
My children were at school with their children, and although it was widely rumoured that the young adults that they conscripted, for want of a better word, on the streets and put to work in their many businesses, were little more than slave labour, it never crossed my mind that the children of families that we knew within this brotherhood might be at any more risk of sexual abuse than any other children.
Those members of the Jesus Army that I knew personally were families, and probably middle-ranking or higher in the hierarchy - I wonder if that meant that their children were less likely to be victims of abuse at the hands of others in their community. For their sake, I hope so.
The article doesn't actually say that victims were being abused by their parents. I can't say it didn't happen because, sadly, it can happen anywhere, but in their shared houses, it feels more likely to me that the abuse came other community members rather than family.
I'm not sure how social workers could have helped unless someone actually reported abuse or suspected abuse. Without such reports, then surely they would have had no more reason to investigate the Jesus Army than to investige you or me.
It is so sad that children anywhere are subjected to such abuse.