I worked until I was sixty-five, which is what I planned to do and never had any intention of doing otherwise. I also had a mortgage to pay, which was an incentive. What I found perturbing were the number of women, friends and acquaintances, who were well-qualified and competent, who returned to work sometime after having children and never worked more than two days a week. Of twenty women I knew well only two of us worked full time, the rest two days a week, although to hear them talk it appeared they were the only ones running their particular department.
We were all fortunate to be educated and trained in the 1960s/70s, all for free, with opportunities opening up for female promotion and responsibilities due to the fight for equality in the workplace and women's lib. No one forced us to go to college or university. All that money wasted.
What concerns me more is the pressure young mothers are under to return to the workplace immediately while their babies are brought up by others at extortionate cost. I heard a suggestion recently that regulations on nurseries should be relaxed so they could take more babies at less cost to get more mothers back to work.
Better if older working women used their expertise and worked longer, particularly the more experienced ones and those with older children, instead of hanging on to their carefully negotiated two days a week following maternity leave.
I doubt if Starmer will get many of those 'economically inactive' back to work; the workshy will continue to avoid work and if in work continue with the dishonest quiet quitting, which won't help productivity.