I don't wear any makeup at all and haven't since the pale pink lipstick, blue eyeshadow and clumpy mascara days of the seventies. I'm now 68, a bit wrinkled where the laughs have been, and a Scottish peelywally shade most of the year.
I think that people should do what they are comfortable with, so long as it hurts no-one. I suppose that some people who have spent some time on their make-up probably look at me, at a wedding say, and quietly make negative judgements. That's up to them.
I did notice the unquestioned assumptions in some of the posts here:
Most Pale ladies look better with a little make up on Better than...?
Other people take you more seriously, as though you have made an effort with your appearance and not let yourself go. So much to wonder about in this one sentence. 'take you more seriously'? 'made an effort'? 'let yourself go'?
piggy eyes Aren't eyes just eyes?
Why would you need your face to be more defined? Or describe its natural colour as washed out without makeup? Why would imperfections need to be concealed?
Why do some people feel the need to perpetuate the pervasive denial of normal aging processes by making themselves look younger?
I did state my belief at the beginning that people should do what they are comfortable with so long as it hurts no-one. Are some of these assumptions, evident through the language people unthinkingly use, responsible for many of our grandchildren (it's not restricted to the girls), feeling that their beautiful natural appearance, whatever it is, has to be modified through make-up, hormones, diets or phone filters to be acceptable to the outside world?