I think its very important to apply a "not all rationale" in both sides of the argument, not all asylum seekers are genuine, some will be, just as some amongst their numbers will be trouble makers/criminals. Amongst those staying in hotels and those who have been granted settled status, there will be some who have committed criminal acts, and have no intention of changing their ways, which would somewhat prove they are bogus because they wouldn't flout the laws of their host country and they would treat its inhabitants with more respect if they felt that being allowed to stay hinged on that. Unfortunately for the genuine ones they are all lumped together from public perception. Hence the protests outside the hotels, again some are local people with genuine grievances who feel they are not being listened to. Into that mix come professional agiatators from both the right and left who appear to want to fan the flames of discontent further and tip any protest over into violence. It doesn't help that these hotels appear to be packed full of young single men. There have been numerous criminal incidents perpetuated by asylum seekers and it would be good if those were recognised as a threat rather than brushed under the carpet because not doing so is very divisive, even if you just take GN as a snapshot of the overall mood of the country. Contrary to that we do need to recognise there are people, where we, as part of the free world should be prepared to give sanctuary to, although as a relatively small country we have finite amounts of space, housing and other infrastructure that certainly impacts negatively on our own people before others need to be catered for from those limited resources.