Two pieces of journalism that stick in my mind are:
Max Hastings in June 2019: I was Boris Johnson’s boss: he is utterly unfit to be prime minister.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jun/24/boris-johnson-prime-minister-tory-party-britain
Jonathan Lis from August 2020: Boris Johnson: The Anti-Prime Minister
www.bylinesupplement.com/p/boris-johnson-the-mutant-algorithm
So many paragraphs in the latter stand out but a few here:
And so the key to this game is failure. Johnson does not set out to fail per se. Rather, failure is just another route to winning. He fails to prove the failure won’t hurt him. He sabotages things because he can.
Johnson wanted to become Prime Minister but never to be Prime Minister – at least, not in the formal sense of doing what leaders are appointed to do. For him, power is about breaking precedent, cheating the system, scoring the con to end all cons.
The thrill of failure is just that: a thrill. … When you are so purely solipsistic that only the self exists, you are capable of centring, considering, governing only for yourself. Cronies cling to you for the scraps of self-interest they can pluck in your wake. This is corruption at its most decadent: botching a crisis or destroying a national infrastructure not for political gain, nor even for financial reward, but ultimately for pure personal sport.
Now there’s someone just the same in the White House and another in the wings here in the UK behaving the same way.
That line Johnson wanted to become Prime Minister but never to be Prime Minister – at least, not in the formal sense of doing what leaders are appointed to do could be describing Farage. He wanted to be a Member of Parliament but doesn't want to do the work of a Member of Parliament. Heaven help us if he ever gets to number 10.