Oops! The Prince formerly known as Duke drops another clanger!

Prostitution is not going to go away.

If far more attention was paid by society to bringing up boys to be morally responsible for what is in their pants, rather than bringing up girls to avoid possible danger by not wearing certain clothing or going out late at night, there might be a sea change.
We need to deal with the cause rather than locking up our daughters - and I don’t mean that literally of course just as I realise many men aremorally responsible for what is in their pants.
But do let’s start by blaming sexual predators and not looking for ways in which prostitution could be made safer etc.

If he is proved to have had sex with underage girls, this means prison surely, then the monarchy would be finished. I think his wife is as bad. She should be investigated too. She didn't mind the money rolling in. The name of that plane they used, full of young girls going to an Island they had no way of leaving, it's vile. If it were my parents I would never see them again. .

He could be quite easily dealt with. Remember the Duke of Windsor! Although of course he never wanted to be King 👑 apparently in the first place, he only to marry the woman he loved!

This particular “spare” comes across as an arrogant prig and I would be happy not to see his mardy face again. But I do hope that he gets his comeuppance.
Same applies to Sarah Ferguson. That pair would be an utter embarrassment to any family.

I know Iam64. Can't think what it is making me think like this 🙄

Thanks Onlymedea

ferry23

Call me an old cynic, but I can't help but think the law is massively weighted against women.

Cynic - that’s in the same ball park as me being an innocent abroad.

The law, massively weighted against women - goodness ferry23, on a thread where Virginia Guiffre is alternately accused of prostitution and pimping - and you have the brass neck to suggest the law might be a bit biased against women …….

Call me an old cynic, but I can't help but think the law is massively weighted against women.

paddyann54 I entirely agree. It's the men who should be charged.

Mollygo

Paddyanne54
Many years ago while working late we saw a young girl being manhandled into a lorry in the lane opposite .My co worker went across to distract the guy while I called the police.
They turned up in minutes but they picked her up for apparently soliciting and waved him on his way.The assault was dismissed.

I wish I didn’t have to believe that, but I do.

When my neighbour reported a man for exposing himself, near a local school, they asked her what she was wearing and had she stopped to look?

It's more complicated than that. I don't think she would have been charged with anything as the police need evidence she was soliciting, unless it has changed since I worked for the vice squad. She was probably taken somewhere safe to check her age and if she'd been reported missing.

With men yes I've done the court paperwork where men have been arrested but you need evidence, not just that they are driving round. Usually it was a policewoman in plain clothes being approached by a man but he would have to make it clear he was wanting to buy sex and most men would talk in euphemisms so a lot of effort would go, the policewoman and probably a team of two watching from a distance to ensure she was safe, and not great results.

Making a case against pimps was even more time consuming.

It can all be done but do we have enough police, are we willing to pay for enough police, if you are burgled or mugged can you promise you won't complain about police wasting their time on what consenting adults are doing?

Ferry23, I have not read the book to date- dubious does not surprise me in the least. I'll put it on my list 👍.

ronib

Each to their own I guess but Prince Andrew’s downfall seems to have turned up at the perfect time to divert attention from the grooming gang crisis. Or was this all my imagination?

I think it must be your imagination. The grooming scandal thread is one of the busiest on here and all TV channels have given it extensive news coverage.

It has frequently been the headline story on both printed and digital media.

Each to their own I guess but Prince Andrew’s downfall seems to have turned up at the perfect time to divert attention from the grooming gang crisis. Or was this all my imagination?

LemonJam - have you read the Andrew Lownie book "Entitled"?

There's quite a lot of insight into the Yorks' financial dealings. Most of it rather dubious.

I think Prince Andrew and his ex-wife are clinging on to royal life by their fingernails. Inevitably financial scrutiny will turn to their daughters. Again, the scrupulously researched book is somewhat damning towards them.

Returning to the OP- Ferry28 I'm looking forward to hearing the outcome of the Metropolitan Police probe into Prince Andrew and his attempts to dish the dirt on Virginia Giuffre. Meanwhile he certainly does just keep giving.

An interesting article in the press today (sorry I'm fairly new to Gransnet, have only been posting for several months, have tried but have not successfully worked out how to upload a link ) about the mystery of his money making efforts and how he funds his lifestyle. He's been an outcast for some years now because of his association with Epstein yet has no visible means of financial support apart from his naval pension of around £20k a year. He could have lived on the income he received from the public purse, £249,000 a year as he retired the navy in 2001 and carried out good works as a diligent royal.

That seemingly did not sufficiently satisfy him. It has been alleged that he exploited his "Government Trade Representative" post since 2001 to gain access to wealthy people around the world to cut commercial deals to enrich himself further.

Evidently this is not part of current Met Police probe but is fascinating in itself as more things come to light....

Paddyanne54
Many years ago while working late we saw a young girl being manhandled into a lorry in the lane opposite .My co worker went across to distract the guy while I called the police.
They turned up in minutes but they picked her up for apparently soliciting and waved him on his way.The assault was dismissed.

I wish I didn’t have to believe that, but I do.

When my neighbour reported a man for exposing himself, near a local school, they asked her what she was wearing and had she stopped to look?

I always thought it strange the women were prosecuted and the men walked away.
We should look at the MEN who want to buy sex because if they could deal with their urges in other ways there would be no need for women to sell themselves.
Many years ago while working late we saw a young girl being manhandled into a lorry in the lane opposite .My co worker went across to distract the guy while I called the police
They turned up in minutes but they picked her up for apparently soliciting and waved him on his way.The assault was dismissed.

There are already child sex trafficking etc laws in place in UK and USA with serious punitive outcomes for those caught. Regulating the consenting adult sex industry with a starting age of 21 will not deter child sex offenders in any way whatsoever.

It all depends on the punishment proposed for breaking the law, if there is one. Also on the ease with which young girls can report offenders. The support groups in place to help the young etc how much we actually care to stop this? LemonJam. Castration for repeat offenders.

Child sex offenders like Epstein and Maxwell, as in all countries not only the USA, seek to recruit young, underage girls to coerce and sex traffic. Their clients have seek young, underage girls who have no sexual interest in adult consenting women, 21 years or older working in the adult sex industry. Giuffre was abused for the first time at 7 years old and recruited for sex trafficking after she ran away from an unhappy home life at the age of 14.

Regulation by way of a starting age of 21 for the adult sex industry in the UK will do absolutely NOTHING to protect vulnerable girls like Virginia. Neither will it ever stop adult men with an appetite to seek underage girls to meet their sexual needs. In short your proposal would not protect those vulnerable like Virginia as you stated in an earlier post.

Let’s not

Let it forget that Giuffre was also grooming young girls.

If it’s completely illegal for sex workers to be under the age of 21, then Virginia G would have been protected in part. Didn’t Maxwell and Epstein mainly operate in the USA? We can only implement our own protections here and not worldwide.

Well surprise Iam64 I am proposing an age of 21 for sex workers.
I am not in a position to answer your questions.
I cannot speak for some men.
Well what are your proposals, if any?

Castration is of course always an option for repeat offenders?

I understand that regulating the adult sex industry with a starting age of 21 has the aim of preventing teenagers less than 21 being able to work as a consenting adult prostitute legally.

Ronib now appears to accept such regulation will not protect vulnerable girls like Virginia Giuffre from child sex offenders seeking to coerce and traffic them. I am in agreement with this premise.