Lathyrus3
ViceVersa
You do realise that it's not just cats and dogs - fireworks cause untold distress and misery to wildlife and livestock too. Do they not matter to you either?
Or the humans who are distressed by fireworks - presumably you couldn't give a toss about them either because you happen to like fireworks?
As I said, I fail to see what 'benefits' fireworks bring - other than a fleeting enjoyment to some people, whereas animals play a vital role in the lives of so many people. Limiting fireworks to organised displays on certain occasions would be a compromise which many people would find acceptable, would it not?Well yes. I don’t dispute any of your points.
But logically if you can ban fireworks because of the distress that they cause t animals and humans then you can ban cats and dogs as pets because of the distress that they cause to humans and to other other animals, especially wildlife.
Can’t you see that the argument of causing distress applies to both and therefore, can’t really apply to either. Or is it one rule for what I like and a different rule for others?
No, I don't agree with that argument at all. There are many proven benefits to having a pet - please explain to me what are the actual 'benefits' of fireworks, apart from a fleeting display which is over in a few minutes.
And in answer to Rosie51, at least if fireworks were limited to organised displays on certain occasions, then those living close to them would know in advance and could be prepared to limit any distress caused either to themselves, their family or their animals.
