Carbonated
I realised this generation of men was badly affected by the trauma their fathers had to endure. Although their mothers had to suffer the effects of war, it was the men who were expected to face the first hand horror of it. Of course their sons would grow up with second had trauma and often without male figures around them whilst growing up. The daughters also would have grown up with the expectation that men 'provided' and that women did the caring.
I think this is nonsense. To begin with, many men called up in the services did not actually see any action. An army, navy or airforce has a huge tail of logistics, with as many people in it, if not far more , who keep them moving, fed, supplied with vehicles, food, clothes ammunition, medicaal care, transport etc. It includes people who build airstrips, lay water mains, build roads and load and load stores of boats and planes and trains.
Then there are the men wh are not called up because they are in the reserved occupations or cannot serve for other reasons.
Then there were all the women who served in some form in the forces or land army or building weapons, or nursing in hospitals or making bread. Many of these were married women and nurseries were built to look after their children.
Yes, there were fatherless families, but I doubt it was any worse than it is now. As for a generation of women growing up thinking their job is to care. I just pre-date the Boomer genration, but only by a year or two and it was, the war baby, as we were called, and the boomer generation women who were the break out generation demanding jobs and equality with men, moving into professions like law and finance - and engineering and staying or returning to it after they had children.
For most of my working life, I was a pioneer in