I think if you reread my posts you will see that at no time have ai said we should carry on racing because there is nothing else to be done. On the contrary several times I have said that I am not in favour of breeding racehorses and likened it ti the overbreeding that happens with show dogs. I would like you to acknowledge that you are misrepresenting me I suggesting that I have ever said racing should continue because there is nothing else to be done.
What I have continuous done is challenged posters fantasies of racehorses being freed to run around fields as a healthy, happy life for a horse. It is not. It would be neglect and cause suffering. There is enough of that going on right now by those who have bought a horse and thought it could fend for itself.
Or the fantasy of there being a mass of animal lovers who will shoulder the costs of maintaining racehorses for their life span. Equine charities cannot cope now, hence my suggestion that those who really care could make a donation. If not you who? if not now, when? as the saying goes?
What I have asked is that those in favour of a ban do face the reality of the consequences. It will be brutal. Many posters have made the point that the industry is driven by money. A phasing out may work for a couple of years but once the rewards decrease the horses will hold no further interest for their owners. They will be a liability to be discarded like any other financial liability.
I want those in favour of the ban to approach its consequences realistically, not as a storybook tale about f some kind of horse nirvana.
If it is to be done with the minimum possible suffering it must be done realistically, fully acknowledging all the difficulties and the pain.
The attitude of “I don’t like to think about that, so I’ll pretend it isn’t true”frustrates me in many walks of life.