A huge march against the Far Right

Ilovecheese

What did the WW2 veteran think was the worst thing that was wrong with the country?

I think we all know the answer to that one.

What did the WW2 veteran think was the worst thing that was wrong with the country?

Posters may post within the rules, those who disagree may comment and riposte.

it was so sad to read about the WW2 veteran who said what was the sacrifice for

Do you have a link to this please?

Thanks so much.

Inflammatory rhetoric.

Strawman tactic.

Oh dear.
How silly.

Ah, using one person, just one we are likely to have sympathy for, designed to raise sympathy to try and make a very general political point.

Straw man tactic.

It doesn't work.

It was just one man.

DaisyAnneReturns

eazybee

Meandrogrog is entitled to her opinion and her choice of words. You are not a thread moderator.

By any democratic measure eazybee, we are all entitled to our opinion. I would suggest that GNHQ are the "thread moderator" when it comes to choice of words.

Or are you saying we may not disagree with content or presentation - or even demonstrate the bias or untruth in a post? If you write from a bias, presenting it as a truth you are surely going to expect disagreement. Isn't that the point of some people's posts? Inflammatory rhetoric is likely to start fires. The person using it needs to take into account their lack of control of any such "fire" before going down that route.

A lot makes me sad about what is happening to the country, it was so sad to read about the WW2 veteran who said what was the sacrifice for, given the state of the UK. That made me feel really sad.

If anyone is being inflammatory,DAR, it is surely yourself.

eazybee

Meandrogrog is entitled to her opinion and her choice of words. You are not a thread moderator.

By any democratic measure eazybee, we are all entitled to our opinion. I would suggest that GNHQ are the "thread moderator" when it comes to choice of words.

Or are you saying we may not disagree with content or presentation - or even demonstrate the bias or untruth in a post? If you write from a bias, presenting it as a truth you are surely going to expect disagreement. Isn't that the point of some people's posts? Inflammatory rhetoric is likely to start fires. The person using it needs to take into account their lack of control of any such "fire" before going down that route.

eazybee

Meandrogrog is entitled to her opinion and her choice of words. You are not a thread moderator.

Quite.
It is not illegal to claim asylum.
Violating immigration laws makes them illegal immigrants.

Meandrogrog is entitled to her opinion and her choice of words. You are not a thread moderator.

Twice or three times?

At least once every Thread?

Meandrogrog how many times do we have to tell folk like you?

It is not illegal to be an asylum seeker

sixandahalf

You asked for my experience living very close to a Hotel repurposed to house people seeking asylum. I gave it in good faith.

There was nothing particularly sweet about an unaccompanied child in pyjamas running around a busy street. Many children housed in such places are victims of abuse or simply "disappear" They are prevented from having an education. Just as families do make some tenuous links with the outside world, they are moved out of the area.

I wish people would show a shred of compassion.

The fact remains that they are here illegally, it has nothing to to do with compassion.

You asked for my experience living very close to a Hotel repurposed to house people seeking asylum. I gave it in good faith.

There was nothing particularly sweet about an unaccompanied child in pyjamas running around a busy street. Many children housed in such places are victims of abuse or simply "disappear" They are prevented from having an education. Just as families do make some tenuous links with the outside world, they are moved out of the area.

I wish people would show a shred of compassion.

sixandahalf

Meandrogrog

sixandahalf

Quite different then from the article in the Daily Mail I was reading. I am sure the woman who wrote the article was not lying!

You asked me to comment, which I did politely and with honesty. So please don't compare me to the Daily Mail. Thanks

Why are lefties so aggressive?

Please expand on this theory and draw my attention to any rudeness?

Much obliged.

I wasnt comparing you to ‘the Daily Mail’ which is a generic term.

I read an article by a woman, printed in the Daily Mail, giving an account of her experiences of living near a migrant hotel. This was not an account of a little girl lost, how sweet.

I would not dream of using AI to decide on the tone of a post.

Graphite

I am familiar with Reform’s strategy which is to deliberately book a smaller space so that it looks full. They did it here, booked a 200 seater tent when the showground can accommodate 900 people indoors under one roof.

Farage stated on March 27, 2026, that the party had sold out 10 venues in 14 days, with over 10,000 tickets sold. So it’s only an average of a 1,000 per event.

For the city of Norwich, with a population of 150,000 that’s not many people can be bothered to come out and listen to what he says - which is the same old thing at every event.

Most reform voters have no idea what he says and don't care, they just want migration to stop, they hate the EU and Starmer.
Xenophobia if you like, don't expect any logic or reason it's exactly the same as the Brexit vote, many agree with Rupert Lowe, he makes Farage look a moderate.

How can this not have been news worthy.,

Graphite

I am familiar with Reform’s strategy which is to deliberately book a smaller space so that it looks full. They did it here, booked a 200 seater tent when the showground can accommodate 900 people indoors under one roof.

Farage stated on March 27, 2026, that the party had sold out 10 venues in 14 days, with over 10,000 tickets sold. So it’s only an average of a 1,000 per event.

For the city of Norwich, with a population of 150,000 that’s not many people can be bothered to come out and listen to what he says - which is the same old thing at every event.

Yep, exactly this ^

I am familiar with Reform’s strategy which is to deliberately book a smaller space so that it looks full. They did it here, booked a 200 seater tent when the showground can accommodate 900 people indoors under one roof.

Farage stated on March 27, 2026, that the party had sold out 10 venues in 14 days, with over 10,000 tickets sold. So it’s only an average of a 1,000 per event.

For the city of Norwich, with a population of 150,000 that’s not many people can be bothered to come out and listen to what he says - which is the same old thing at every event.

Primrose53

MeanwhileNigel Farage was at a sell out rally in Norwich tonight. For weeks protestors were urged to demonstrate as he entered. A few dozen turned up and had left after a very short while.

Sell out in Norwich, that hotbed of immigration? (not: over 87% white British.) How many seats at the venue, Alan?

You are determined to find fault in what seemed for most people I spoke to an enjoyable and purposeful day.

No, and I can express an opinion on what I have seen publicised in the media without you making a personal attack.

You went, you knew what it was about, you enjoyed yourself.
Fair enough.

But I doubt it has had the impact on the wider public which you hoped for.

That is my opinion and I am entitled to express it.

You are determined to find fault in what seemed for most people I spoke to an enjoyable and purposeful day.

The memory will stay with me as I expect it does for anyone who has ever taken part in any protest; that they got off their backsides and made a stand, whether it was against a war, apartheid, nuclear weapons or the poll tax.

Seems to me the plethora of banners reinforced that fact that this is an alliance of people from all walks of life coming together with a common aim. That's the point.

😀

Well, if they were marching against the Far Right, perhaps banners saying just that.

Perhaps it was the fault of the organisers who should have suggested a common theme for the banners.
Yes, a ‘flag’ of togetherness if you like? One that unites people regardless of borders, skin colour, religion or. . .
Oh, that was ruled out some time ago, wasn’t it?