Preganancy and childbirth now compared to your experience.

I was in for 6 days with my first in the freeze of 1987. No visitors apart from DH who walked through deep snow to get to the hospital. Babies were taken to the nursery at night and a nurse would fetch you when baby was awake.
A huge contrast to when DD had her first, by C-section. There were 6 in the ward, all with partners and babies 24/7. No one got a wink of sleep with talking, crying and phones all night.

When my youngest grandchild was born 10 years ago they were sent home after 6 hrs . My poor Dil barely had time to have her tea and toast and a shower and they were discharged.

I was at home with their 14 month old planning to drop her off to my son at the hospital for a visit. I was gobsmacked when my son phoned to say they were on their way home. The first 24hrs were very difficult as baby was struggling to feed and the less he fed the sleepier and less interested he became. They should never have been discharged before feeding was established.

dalrymple23 I was born in Queen Charlotte’s, obviously before your children

My children were born in The Royal Free, Hampstead in the 80s. It was fabulous care, especially as I had post birth medical issues.
It was known as The Hampstead Hilton, I don’t expect it’s the same nowadays.

Oops, shaved and enema for all apart from last one,

Our last child was born early 1990’s

My husband along with my best friend (who was a senior nurse) were with me throughout.

I had an epidural, and a long protracted labour. I was given the choice of going home after 6 hours or staying in overnight. I chose to stay in overnight.

(Apparently the celebrations at my house were rather exuberant )

Previous labours were with pethadine and gas and air, first one I stayed in hospital for 7 days, baby went to the nursery overnight, and there was a smoking room at the send of the ward.

One before last I stayed in for 4 nights in a private room with its own shower and toilet, bliss.

1st baby in 1960 - shaved, bath and enema! 7 days in hos[ital.
2nd baby 1963 - no time for the three indignities and a much better experience all round. Just 5 days as an inpatient.
In those days a District Nurse visited regularly and was a huge support and help.

I cannot imagine WHY anyone should think enemas were a good idea!

Just over sixty years ago I went into hospital to have my first child. The birth was relatively easy helped on wth liberal amounts of gas and air. No father present, but two midwifes at all times.
10 days in hospital with limited visiting hours. Baby in cot at foot of bed during the day, in the nursery at night. We were not disturbed at night.
Instruction on breast feeding and bathing a baby.
Then home, to night feeds etc and exhaustion.

My first was born in 1965 in Barnet and Ibstayed in the hospital for 14 days. Tge babies were with us in the day but in the nursery at night so we had plenty of sleep and they food was reasonable. The matron ruled the ward with strong discipline of staff and mothers. We were taught how to bath the babe and general child care which was so useful for a first time mother.
My second child was born in DRC Kinshasa 1968 in a hospital run by Belgian nuns and the care was superb.

The third child born in UK in 1964, my husband delivered as the midwife had a headache! I was at home in our new half furnished house and it was freezing cold. He survived!

My last was born in 1997, and there definitely was pram and pushchair snobbery, and designer baby wear was in evidence by that time.

I’m not sure that the childbirth experience for me was that much different to now. I knew I was expecting a boy from very early in my pregnancy, as I had chorionic villus sampling to test for Downs due to my age. I didn’t have a baby shower, but neither did my daughter when my GD was born.

I bet there are as many different experiences as there are Gransnetters with children though. One thing that sticks in my mind is taking my newborn in his navy convertible pram/pushchair, dressed in dark checked dungarees, to the supermarket for the first time, and seeing another mum with a baby about six months old, fully kitted out in white hand crocheted bonnet, matinee jacket, dress and bootees, in a white pram too, and thinking how different we were.

Mine were born 69 73 and 76 I had an enema and was shaved for all of them also told to have a bath I can’t explain how awful the enema for my son was it was very messy and that’s putting it tactfully. I was in hospital 10 days for all of them when I’d of much preferred to go home it was 1976 the hot Summer. They woke you at 5am breakfast at 6 cereal and toast 6 mums to a ward. Nowadays mums are lucky if they stay in for 6hrs.

1972: Queen Charlotte's: 10 days as inpatient; brilliant care

1974: Queen Charlotte's: 5 days as inpatient: not such good care.

1975: Queen Mary's, Roehampton; 7 days as inpatient; good care.

Charlotte's was very baby orientated and, basically, blow the mother!!

Mary's was the reverse - mother most important, waited on hand and foot and let's all go to a sherry party with the doctors and nurses every evening!!! I discovered meanwhile that the baby was turning blue with cold!! No babygro and no blankets!!

The Mary's daughter has three children. The first, born at King's College. An eye watering 12.5lbs. Left in womb for too long, with the inevitable results. He ended up in an incubator but OK now. Because of the history with the first born, Caesarian advised for the next two. They clocked in at 12lbs and 11.10 respectively. Thrown out of hospital in 24 hours. This can't be right, surely?

Like the previous poster, very glad that I had mine i the Seventies. There seemed to be more care then. And, no, I do not think that the university route is the right way for the nursing profession.

i seemed to cross over somewhere. when i had my first in 1986 i had to be shaved have an enema which nearly killed me with contractions! i would never want to go through that again. the labour was traumatic but I stayed in 7 days during which i was shown everything including bathing baby. when i went out despite a few stitches I felt quite good. first time to be dressed as i had been in bed not being dressed.
second baby 6 weeks early and my care was sort of alright. no enemas etc just had the baby. no incubators and they said she was so ill i was told to just hold her and enjoy time with her. late husband was gone to his sisters for the night she was born just before midnight no mobiles etc in those days. no staff came to check on me but at 6 in the morning a nurse came in and was astonished to see was still with us. i was told to have a shower had not had one since giving birth 6 hours earlier. when i came back my baby was gone i was hysterical and eventually a nurse told me an incubator had come free in the intensive care so she had been put in there, I was transfered to one of three rooms further down the corridor, this hospital has gone now, i stayed in there 3 weeks until i went home. my husband did not drive then so it was train everyday to see me and baby having to bring our other child as my late mum was working. talking of mum i was really worried about going into special care for the first time and my dear mum took a day off work to go with me. i think she was in about two weeks after i went home. we visited daily and she is now a healthy girl born 1987 and now a staff nurse

Perhaps someone on here will know more but I do wonder if separating midwifery training as opposed to it being an add-on after SRN training has had any effect on care standards. I assume someone somewhere has researched this?

My children were born in 1974 and 1976.

Seven days in hospital with both, should have been two with second baby, but kept in as I developed a fever.

Looking back, I felt I had excellent care, decent food, enough staff, sensible visiting times (1 hour in afternoon for family, then husbands only in evening for an hour). Far better than the world and his wife at all hours like nowadays.

When I hear about how it is now, I feel very grateful I gave birth 50 years ago.

I think it’s definitely harder and care is worse. I had my children in 1975, 1980, and 1983. I felt by baby no 3 the care had slipped a bit . In 10 days with the first , 3 days with the 2nd, 36 hrs with the 3rd and had a post partum haemorrhage after the 3rd also. Midwife came to the house and treated me and told me off for going out too soon.

By the time my daughter had her twins in 2009 postnatal care was awful , they expected her to manage 2 babies after a section and when we came to take her home (we were visiting at discharge time ) they said there were no wheelchairs for us to use (3 days post op) .

I was so mad I had a stand up row with the sister and said she wasn’t going anywhere until I found one! I roamed several floors before I found one and took it back to her ward. We kept taking her in extra food because the portions were pitiful , she was starving feeding 2 babies who were both normal weights.

Nowadays you hear of mothers dying, babies dying or damaged, its appalling , for a western country we should be ashamed