Was the woman in the article a real mum of two, or a journalist on a 'dreadful local paper'? If the latter, her trolley is indicative of nothing - in fact a randomly chosen mother of two doesn't say anything about the whole generation to which she belongs, either. Of course a family of four could be fed on £60 if they ate nothing but beans on toast every day, or vegetable soup, whether made from prepared vegetables or ones they prepared themselves. It wouldn't be a varied diet, though, and
People commenting on here about other people's trollies have no idea whether they are shopping for themselves or others - a young shopper may have been filling her trolley with ready meals and gin for her parents, or an older couple shopping for 'sensible' basic ingredients may have been helping out an adult child who cooks from scratch before popping to the pub for their own lunch, or going home to microwave something from Wiltshire Farm Foods.
As someone said upthread, there is no moral dimension to this, and there is no generational divide. Why £60 a week, incidentally? Was the journalist suggesting that it is too much to allow people on benefits, or that people need more? In either case, one shop is no indicator - they would need to live for several months, until they have bought all the incidentals that you don't need every week - herbs and spices, condiments and so on. There were no household or personal hygiene items on that list either - shampoo, washing powder, toothpaste or tampons. They also make up a significant part of a weekly shopping budget.