Does anyone use the very cheap dried spaghetti - it's about 29p in most supermarkets?
I'm just wondering how different it can possibly be from own brands which are around 75p or the branded varieties which are considerably more expensive.
Possibly gluten content which could make the cheap one clump together in the pan.
Just interested to see if there's a vast difference.
Pasta from Gragnano not far from Naples, is generally the best. It is still made the traditional way. You really can taste the difference why buying dried.
I make my own, no comparison and I wouldn’t go back to the shop bought stuff. I do cheat in that I have an automatic machine you just chuck egg, flour and water in, I gave up with the kneading a while back but if you can be bothered that is even nicer.
I buy store brand tri-coloured rotini. It is the house favourite. I have tried others and no one likes them especially not the ones made with whole wheat flour.
Personally I don’t notice any difference* between dried varieties - I often buy Asda’s Smartprice penne for e.g. macaroni cheese, and any old spaghetti for spag Bol.
Obviously the fresh variety is nicer, but I find the package sizes either not quite enough, or just too much. At least with dried you can use exactly as much as you need.
*I can accept that my taste buds may not be of the most ‘gourmet’ variety though!
I have found that, wouldn't you know it, the super expensive top dried brand of wholemeal spaghetti tastes much nicer than supermarket own. The latter reminds me I'm being worthy, whereas the former is just delicious 😋. Not so bad when it's on offer, but a lot more than cheap white spaghetti.
I don’t mind dried spaghetti, macaroni or penne, but much prefer fresh for lasagna. Not that I make the lasagna that’s hubby job. DGD just loves her Pappa’s lasagna and our AC’s argue over who’s taking home any leftovers
I think that the cheaper pasta has a softer texture, even if carefully cooked. Personally I like a bit more "bite" though I know that others like softer pasta.
More expensive pasta is made using bronze dies which give the pasta a rougher surface. This means the sauce sticks to the pasta better. Thin sauces will run off cheap pasta and pool in the plate. Italians also think that the water used to make the pasta is important. They use far less sauce in their pasta sauces than we we do so you can really taste the difference in the pasta.
I wasn't sure why some pasta has a rougher texture than others so thanks Deedaa I knew the sauce sticks to that type of pasta better.
More expensive pasta is made using bronze dies which give the pasta a rougher surface. This means the sauce sticks to the pasta better. Thin sauces will run off cheap pasta and pool in the plate. Italians also think that the water used to make the pasta is important. They use far less sauce in their pasta sauces than we we do so you can really taste the difference in the pasta.
I agree with ordinarygirl - it's to do with the quality of the flour used. When I make my own pasta I use 00 grade flour which is more finely milled. If I have run out of that I've used ordinary plain flour in the past and the difference isn't really in the taste but in the texture. 00 grade flour gives the pasta a silkier texture, whereas plain flour gives a coarser, grainier version.
I imagine a basic flour rather than a finer flour but not much in terms of taste. I generally find the basic flour pasta takes longer to cook but I don't know why