Actually I will eat some anyway.
Gransnet forums
Health
Carb test
(13 Posts)Would a lightly salted whole grain low fat rice cake do? No crackers in at the moment.
DH has found that cutting out carbs makes a huge difference to his diabetes. I'm continuing to eat them as normal so I'll give this a try and see if I should be cutting down. I remember us chewing bread in biology classes at school to prove that starches turned to sugar, but no one bothered about how long it took.
I will try this when I haven't had a couple of glasses of wine 
Thank you for this, I recently had a test for coeliac disease which was negative; however, at least one other member of the family has been diagnosed.
I am wondering if I could be 'intolerant' without having it.
I appreciate the personal bollocks, jings, so to speak 
The only crackers I have in the house at the moment are salt and pepper ones. It doesn't work with them - I chewed it for over a minute with no sweet taste. By then it had disintegrated. I'll have another go when I have some unsalted ones.
That's really interesting, thatbags! I can't try it at the moment as I haven't any unsalted cracker biscuits (that probably says something about me!) but will buy some next time I go to the shops.
jbf that sounds a bit old-fashioned. There is a lot of evidence to suggest that our bodies react in many different ways to all kinds of things; the effectiveness of drugs, the variation in the composition of the bacteria in our guts and elsewhere, not to mention allergies (I mean very clear allergies, not the ones based on how people 'feel'). Our bodies do react very differently to different stimuli and I cannot see any reason why that should not apply to the composition of our food intake.
(The hashtag was for *bags's eyes only)
I don't believe we need "different diets tailored to our own genes"
Just don't believe it.
#bollocks
Anya your story is like mine when it comes to DH. I do not have biscuits and sweet things in the house as neither of us has a sweet tooth but DH started having toast for breakfast instead of eggs or bacon.
Unfortunately me joining him is out of the question as I used an alternative test to see if I required carbohydrates. I tried the Atkins diet, which DH thrived on. The first attempt lasted 10 days. I felt quite ill after the 4th day and by the 10th I was faced with eating carbs or taking a sickie. I had toast for breakfast instead of a similar calorie value protein one and within an hour I felt better. A sandwich at lunch and I was fine. I tried it again a few months later and had to give up after 4 days because I felt so ill. I didn't even lose any weight on the diet either.
Now, I include a small portion of carbohydrates in all my meals. I know that carbohydrate-free eating is emphatically not for me.
That doesn't surprise me at all bags as I know I have no problem with carbs, but DH does, and type 2 diabetes runs in his family. Several years ago he was told he was pre-diabetic and I put him on a low carb diet. He found it hard, but he lost weight and his blood glucose returned to normal.
But over the next couple of years he gradually regressed until he was pre-diabetic again. It was because I continued to eat carbs, and as they were in the house in the form of breads, jams, biscuits, etc. he found it hard to resist. I decided I'd just have to decarb the house, and go on his low-carb régime with him.
It was a bit like one of a couple trying to give up smoking while the other puffed away.
I've always wondered though which came first, an almost addiction to carbs leading to type 2 diabetes or an inherited tendancy to type 2 which makes some people crave carbs?
I might try your test next time there's a cracker in the house!! DH us back to normal blood sugar levels and other health problems are much less obvious.
Apparently some people thrive on carbs, others don't. Times. I have no opinion on this yet. I've only just found the article. I did notice that one of the comments says: "This article is mainly about selling a book. The basics of our calorie requirement are omitted and this article goes off at a tangent to discuss some small print issues. For those who do not know better this can be misleading."
I haven't done the test yet.
Dr Moalem’s three-minute cracker test: what’s your carbs limit?
What you will need: an unsalted cracker such as a cream cracker or water biscuit and a timer
The goal of this test is to find out which of the three carbohydrate consumption categories you fall into: Full, Moderate or Restricted. You will get this information by the amount of time it takes for a change in taste from bland to sweet to occur when you’re chewing the cracker. If you never detect a change in taste, that’s normal — and significant — too.
Place the cracker in your mouth and start timing and chewing. You will need to pay close attention, as the starch in the cracker may already be starting to be digested by amylase in your saliva. Don’t swallow. As soon as you detect a change in taste — it can be quite subtle — or if you reach 30 seconds while timing, stop chewing and note the time. Rerun the test twice more for accuracy. Take an average so you can get your carb type.
The number of seconds it takes for the taste to change dictates your carb type:
0-14 seconds
Your carb type is Full. You naturally thrive on carbs. This means you can have up to 50 per cent of your calories coming from carbs, 20 per cent from protein and 30 per cent from fats.
15-30 seconds
Your carb type is Moderate. Your body finds carbs harder to process. This means you can have up to 35 per cent of your calories coming from carbs, 30 per cent from protein and 35 per cent from fats.
More than 30 seconds
Your carb type is Restricted. Your body finds carbs hard to process. This means you should have no more than 25 per cent of your calories coming from carbs, 35 per cent from protein and 40 per cent from fats.
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »

