... like Stoptober, taxpayer funded (£650 per smoker who quits) anti-smoking campaign in October.
This article by Mark Littlewood argues that it is private sector technology (safe ways of delivering nicotine, including but not just e-cigarettes) that is really helping people to quit smoking, and that it would help more if government stopped restrictions on advertising these new 'healthier' ways to enjoy nicotine. This would enable all year round anti-smoking 'campaigning' too; it wouldn't be limited to October and it wouldn't be wasting taxes.
Supposing, for the sake of argument, that nicotine is not the harmful part of cigarettes (what harms lungs is the tar from the burning of tobacco), what do people think of the argument?
Retiring and living frugally in money from downsizing after years of stress






