Leading article in the Times today arguing that, while vaping ('smoking' e-cigarettes) is demonstrably safer at delivering nicotine than smoking burning tobacco and inhaling tar and other carcinogens, academics doing the research into the benefits should not "muddy the research waters" by attending tobacco company "jollies".
To put it another way, the article is arguing against tobacco companies' funding research on this subject.
While I get what they're saying, I'm also left asking: why shouldn't tobacco companies fund this research? Who else is going to fund it? If getting nicotine to people is what, ultimately, the tobacco companies want to do to maintain their income, what is wrong with them funding research into delivering it more safely than at present?
Especially if the academics doing the research publicly declare all their funding sources. Which they have to.
Retiring and living frugally in money from downsizing after years of stress





